15. The key to solving environmental problem is simple: present generation are willing to accept a less comfortable life for the sake of the future generation. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It has been discussed for decades about how to tackle with the environmental problem on our planet. Some people argued that human beings can simply live with lower standards to give the next generations a better future. However, I strongly disagree with this point of view. Many people would not like to have a lifestyle which worse than what they have been having, and even though some of them want to make a change, the problem cannot be solved without actions from governments.
To begin with, many people are unwilling to have a less comfortable life. People, especially residents in developing countries, are actually unsatisfied with their current living conditions. For instance, most of the young people in China still need to work extremely hard to buy a house, to have a car and to lead a life that they want. Those who are working for a living are going to consume more daily necessities like food and clothes. They are damaging the environment rather than saving the earth.
To consider another side, some of the people who are concerning about the environment want to sacrifice for their children and grandchildren. Normally, the main reason why they can think about others and can care about global problems is that they have had what they need and do not need to pursue more materials. However, even though there are people would like to try, it’s difficult to change due to the limited influence they will have. Instead, only if all the governments over the world work together, appeal for a change and set up laws, can the environmental problem be solved.
In conclusion, it is unrealistic to deal with the environmental problem by sacrificing comfortable life. Millions of people would not do that, and it will not have a significant effect. I believe governments can do more in this problem.
- Some people think that government funding for schools should be spent on science and maths subjects rather than other subjects Do you agree or disagree 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People in the past are more interested in improving their neighbourhood (the area where they live) than now. 73
- The table below shows the amount of waste production in millions of tonnes in six different countries over a twenty year period
- TPO 43 80
- People now can better protect the environment than they could in the past 42
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 27, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...he earth. To consider another side, some of the people who are concerning about the env...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 50, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...er another side, some of the people who are concerning about the environment want to sacrifice...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 587, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...an the environmental problem be solved. In conclusion, it is unrealistic to deal...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, however, if, so, still, for instance, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1515.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90291262136 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67660040613 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556634304207 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0444333414 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.6875 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3125 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165408278669 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0585769898933 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0403541818179 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113782351119 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0408855136768 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.