3.0
(2 votes)
34615 02 Jan 2018
In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Concerning the issue of whether the government should impose on a strict regulation impose high taxes on junk food as it is highly likely to bear negative impacts on people health. In my opinion, it has both strengths and weaknesses in equal measure.
On the one hand, putting a very high tax rate on fast food would bring about a number of benefits for not only consumers but also businesses. Certainly, people health may be controlled and regulated more effectively than ever, especially for children who actually crave for eating a variety of kinds of fast food such as potato chips, fried chicken, etc. More specifically, the rates of patients surrering obesity and cardiovascular disease would be diminished significantly because harmful substances are mostly rejected by pervasive precaution on social media by the government's endorsement. Moreover, those fast food is often overpriced, people tend to change eating habit by opting more reasonsable and
affordable substitutes, which is in line with their income brackets/levels. The manufacturers begin to produce organically ready-to-eat foods available on shelves for health-conscious consumers. This helps totally abolish outdated food consumption manner.
On the other hand, increasing in fast food's tax can exert several undesirable effects on the operation of businesses. First and foremost, high taxation is the principal reason, causing the majority of manufacturers, distributors, and retailers are on the verge of bankruptcy. Obviously, purchasers tend to choose kinds of food which contain healthier ingredients instead of harmful ones when they are well-informed and aware of its far- reaching consequences via media platforms. Secondly, the increasing tax levied on fast- food means the workforce is made redundant to cut back on operation expenses.
In conclusion, I am convinced that imposing a high tax on fast food is appropriate in order to prevent health issues. However, in particular, it could entail drawbacks which leaves on negativity on businesses.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-26 | Trinh-tuan | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-22 | nobody123456789 | 90 | view |
| 2023-07-15 | dodi1234 | 67 | view |
| 2023-06-20 | Giang Tran | 89 | view |
| 2023-06-20 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
- 3.0(2 votes) 34615 02 Jan 2018In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food. To what exte 89
- Children educating is very expensive. In some countries government pay partly or all of dictation fees. Do the advantages outweigh the advantages? 84
- Some people believe that parents should devote more time to helping their children with schoolwork. Others think that they should allocate more time to playing sports with their kids. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 570, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...asive precaution on social media by the governments endorsement. Moreover, those fast food ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Affordable
... habit by opting more reasonsable and affordable substitutes, which is in line with thei...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, in conclusion, in particular, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1731.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56591639871 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2065310829 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646302250804 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5349737736 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.642857143 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2142857143 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0714285714 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285650544487 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0930907459584 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.063021038058 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149086913047 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0262273846536 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.06 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.