Children educating is very expensive. In some countries government pay partly or all of dictation fees. Do the advantages outweigh the advantages?
People have different viewpoints about whether children should be supported with tuition fees by the government or not. While I accept that funding for children’s schooling sometimes have drawbacks, I believe that there are more notable benefits to be considered.
On the one hand, there are some compelling reasons why it is claimed that school fees should not be fully or partially funded by the government. First and foremost, since other expenses, especially spending on healthcare, infrastructure, social welfare, etc, are much more important national budget may be inadequate and insufficient for children’s education. In fact, the costs of pre-school and primary education are prohibitively expensive, which implies that the government’s financial allowance is highly likely to be impossible. Secondly, if the government just focused on the educational development without caring for other levels, this could result in imbalanced financial allocation and the permanent educational strategy. This means that high-school and university students who have unfavourable conditions may have to pay school fees, which makes them feel more under stressful.
However, I would agree with those who believe that the government should sponsor children’s education. The main reason for this view is that the burden of tuition fees to parents could be shared and eased significantly. More specifically, in addition to their children’s school fees, they have to cover a wide range of the cost of living such as housing, food, transport, entertainment, etc. The governmental support is vital for them. Another reason for this opinion is that children could have access to a well-rounded education with the governmental subsidies, and they could therefore, develop physical and mental prosperity. Last but not least, the focus of funding for children would help them build a solid foundation which is an underlying and essential step for onward levels.
In conclusion, there are some negative impacts if the government fund for children’s education in some extent, but in my perspective it could create more benefits for the aspects of life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-12 | Hieutrungnguyen | 84 | view |
- 3.0(2 votes) 34615 02 Jan 2018In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food. To what exte 89
- Children educating is very expensive. In some countries government pay partly or all of dictation fees. Do the advantages outweigh the advantages? 84
- Some people believe that parents should devote more time to helping their children with schoolwork. Others think that they should allocate more time to playing sports with their kids. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1841.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62996941896 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23886851293 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574923547401 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 557.1 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3076558548 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.5 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3571428571 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57142857143 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131252653141 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0511457246806 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.035774289024 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0966607961049 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0295673105895 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.67 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.