Accidents are common on roads. What are the causes of this problem? Can you speculate the effects of this phenomenon? How could the frequency of accidents be reduced?
Nowadays, road accidents are undoubtedly becoming more prevalent in most countries. In my view, this phenomenon has resulted from two main reasons and it has brought about several thorny issues, which could be addressed by a number of appropriate remedies.
It is suggested that the culprits of this alarming threat stem from the carelessness of humans and other neutral factors such as weather conditions or the infrastructure facilities. Today, people would rather use personal vehicles than public transports, but many of them are incautious and reckless drivers. The fact that people changing lanes too quickly, speeding well over the limit, running a red light or consuming alcohol is among the most common causes of fatal injuries, thereby the higher number of accidents. Moreover, the problem is complicated by such inclement weather as heavy rain. Obviously, when the road becomes overly wet and slippery, it makes driving conditions treacherous. Therefore, vehicles can lose their grip and slide across the road surface, reducing control for drivers and increasing the risk of an accident occurring.
Traffic accidents can cause physical, financial and mental effects for everyone involved. Drivers and passengers can suffer from minor cuts and bruises to broken limbs, back and spinal injuries and even death. Vehicles in traffic accidents are damaged and may be in need of minor or costly repairs or maybe no longer drivable. Additional effects of traffic accidents can include emotional and mental distress as people can suffer from post-traumatic stress from being involved in the accident or from losing a loved one due to a traffic accident.
There are several measures that governments could perform to mitigate the foregoing issues. Firstly, the action that should be taken by the government to reduce road accidents is to improve the maintenance and enhancement of road systems. A second measure should be to increase citizen awareness about the adverse consequences of traffic accidents through mass media. Finally, it’s important that traffic participants adhere strictly to traffic laws and be aware of the speed at which they’re travelling and stay within the posted speed limits.
To sum up, road accidents occur for a combination of reasons, from unexpected weather to unsafe road design, or other drivers lack caution. Negative consequences have ensued, be that as it may, there appear to be several prescriptions to solve the problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-31 | Bunheehee98 | 89 | view |
| 2019-07-07 | giang7798 | 84 | view |
- The availability of entertainment such as video games on handheld devices are harmful to individual and to the society they live in To what extent do you agree and disagree 89
- Drug abuse is becoming more and more common in many countries. What are some of the problems associated with drug abuse, and what are some of the possible solutions? 84
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.Why is this the case? What can be done about this problem? 89
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their wast 84
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, may, moreover, second, so, therefore, well, such as, in my view, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 10.4138276553 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2097.0 1615.20841683 130% => OK
No of words: 386.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43264248705 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80642539851 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 176.041082164 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60103626943 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 633.6 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0091112986 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.5 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4444444444 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 3.9879759519 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258016542639 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0722216893459 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0515758025061 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131560310153 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0401942551081 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.91 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 78.4519038076 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.