Advertising encourages consumers to buy in quantity rather than promoting quality. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
These days, advertising holds an important role in the economic development. Many people believe that advertisement’s aim is the amount of consumption and quality of products are not improved. In my opinion, I partly agree with this idea.
On the one hand, advertising can promote the advancement of manufacturing process. Firstly, advertisements inform customers about the choices that they have. It provides some details about products like nutrition index, components and features which help consumer select suitable items. Secondly, advertisements create competitions among companies. Currently, customers often tent to healthy products and give their feedback about advantages and disadvantages of goods on selling website after they utilize. As a result, companies must enhance quality of products and reduce prizes in order to meet customer’s demand.
On the other hand, advertising mainly focus on selling products. First, advertisements often exaggerate quality of products which lead to buying of consumers. False information which is not endorsed can mislead customers about their quality of goods. For example, on Facebook many girls often buy cosmetics which are unknown origin through exaggeration of uses. These products can cause allergies, skin infection and other diseases which impact seriously on their health. Furthermore, now we live in a consumer culture with continuous changes of technology and modern products and fashion clothing. And advertisements persuade us to follow the latest trend or stick certain brands with a higher status. If we do not have a careful and wise selection, we will waste time, money and lose our satisfaction of life.
In conclusion, I agree that advertising is a key part of business and have positive effect on their consumer culture if it conveys real information to customers.
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries. 73
- The table below shows the percentage of the population by age groups inone town who rode bicycles in 2011. 78
- : The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015. 67
- The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology of developing countries by charities in the US, EU and other countries from 2006 to 2010. 67
- The illustrations below show how chocolate is produced. 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1570.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62724014337 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1537878611 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63082437276 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.653630482 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.2222222222 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11111111111 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130087265988 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.043032740621 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0316945102895 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0860593630882 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0135357842353 0.056905535591 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.33 50.2224549098 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.