All towns and cities need to have large outdoor public spaces such as parks or squares. Do you agree or disagree?
It is thought that all towns and cities should to have large outdoor public spaces such as parks or squares. From my point of view, i mostly agree with this notion because of its benefits for the population life. The following essay will analyse this statement in detail.
First of all, in the contemporary world and with the appearence of modern technology that individuals are just concentrate in their occupation, so local public comunity is greatly significant for the social. Not only will this phenomenon provide the helpful environment for relaxation and entertainment to improve the immune systerm of adolesence which advance their mentality life, but also the sociaoeconomic problem can be narrowed gradually by the connection of public place, improved the economic background. Furthermore, numerous relationship will be created such as international friend, local speaker or abroad teenagers who have various possitive affection for their development. To illustrate, there was a vurvey by Pep Bartob, the famous interviewer and professor who is an expert about the success of postgraduates in London who have quality community. The statistic demonstrated that nearly everyone has got plenty of achievement in their career.
However, we can not negate the drawback of this trouble for the people acitivities. The appartment or their importance local which have strength effective for the development of their nation can be bulit by the governent in public place and also various conflict and controversial will hapen in oder to lacking of generation. Moreover many government take agvantage from this investment for their own revenue, harmful influence will be led by this action to the young.
To conclude, though my agrument from the essay, i totally agree with this statement, but it still have some negative aspect for the people. The state need to have clear plans to improve their citizens for the nation's development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-18 | hieu13092006 | 89 | view |
| 2021-12-21 | quynhhuong656 | 82 | view |
| 2021-06-05 | namtq289 | 61 | view |
| 2021-05-07 | cumaihuong99 | 84 | view |
| 2020-12-11 | Singhfilms | 61 | view |
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- In some countries online shopping is replacing shopping in stores Do you think it is a positive or negative development 89
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal Some people however think that other types of progress are equally important for a country Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
- Technology causes more problems for modern society than it solves Do you agree or disagree 67
- Many people use written language in a less formal and more relaxed way Why Does this development have advantages and disadvantages 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ill analyse this statement in detail. First of all, in the contemporary world ...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lenty of achievement in their career. However, we can not negate the drawback ...
^^
Line 3, column 329, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...hapen in oder to lacking of generation. Moreover many government take agvantage from thi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l be led by this action to the young. To conclude, though my agrument from the...
^^
Line 4, column 101, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'has'?
Suggestion: has
...agree with this statement, but it still have some negative aspect for the people. Th...
^^^^
Line 4, column 212, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...plans to improve their citizens for the nations development.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, still, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.3376753507 276% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1632.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35081967213 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94404322088 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613114754098 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.3009352167 49.4020404114 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.538461538 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4615384615 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61538461538 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16439052233 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0717335932095 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136715401652 0.0667982634062 205% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125251006678 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106504884994 0.056905535591 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.06 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ill analyse this statement in detail. First of all, in the contemporary world ...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lenty of achievement in their career. However, we can not negate the drawback ...
^^
Line 3, column 329, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...hapen in oder to lacking of generation. Moreover many government take agvantage from thi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l be led by this action to the young. To conclude, though my agrument from the...
^^
Line 4, column 101, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'has'?
Suggestion: has
...agree with this statement, but it still have some negative aspect for the people. Th...
^^^^
Line 4, column 212, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...plans to improve their citizens for the nations development.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, still, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.3376753507 276% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1632.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35081967213 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94404322088 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613114754098 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.3009352167 49.4020404114 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.538461538 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4615384615 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61538461538 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16439052233 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0717335932095 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136715401652 0.0667982634062 205% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125251006678 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106504884994 0.056905535591 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.06 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.