Although more and more people read news on the Internet, newspapers will remain the most important source of news. Do you agree or disagree?
Many traditionalists believe that newspapers would still be the most essential source of news while others have quick access to read news via Internet. In my opinion, I totally agree that online news would be more convenient.
There are some outstanding advantages of reading online news.Firstly, with the fast-paced development of information technology which allows everyone could easily approach online news via the Internet. For example, a recent report in Vietnam claimed that adolescents or adults have their own smartphone or laptop which enable them to quickly access many sources of news by just a click away. As a result, countless people can read up-to-the-minute news without any effort of going to grocery store to purchase a newspaper. Secondly, as reading news by surfing websites, news could be selected wisely. For example, there are various opinion from one new, but the citizens could read the variety of news and put these true pieces of new into a complete picture.
On the other hand, conventional newspapers could have some disadvantages. Firstly, as releasing one constant content, many people could be mislead by authorizes. For example, residents who read newspaper which content only one point of view could be mislead by these papers, and then, they could misunderstand some situations. Secondly, the more newspapers produced, the more hectare of forest would be chopped down. As using trees to manufacture printed newspapers to meet the need of traditionalists, more and more forest would be cut down.
In conclusion, I agree that online news need to approach more and more people instead of the old-fashion access of newspapers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-06 | Bakhtiyar1 | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | Bakhtiyar1 | 11 | view |
| 2019-11-24 | catngan | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-24 | catngan | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-18 | Hira Shaheen | 84 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 61, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Firstly
...nding advantages of reading online news.Firstly, with the fast-paced development of inf...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 349, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun source seems to be countable; consider using: 'many sources'.
Suggestion: many sources
...top which enable them to quickly access many source of news by just a click away. As a resu...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 527, Rule ID: MANY_FEW_UNCOUNTABLE[2]
Message: Use 'much' or 'little' with uncountable nouns.
Suggestion: much; little
...tore to purchase a newspaper. Secondly, many news could be selected wisely. For exam...
^^^^
Line 2, column 527, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun news seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much news', 'a good deal of news'.
Suggestion: much news; a good deal of news
...tore to purchase a newspaper. Secondly, many news could be selected wisely. For example, ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 502, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o meet the need of traditionalists, more and more forest would be cut down. Conse...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, second, secondly, so, still, then, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1501.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1937716263 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86853089346 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560553633218 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8407291497 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.214285714 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6428571429 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1428571429 7.06120827912 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.244688304435 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.084324248473 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.151304729494 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.056905535591 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.