Although there is a lot of translation software available learning a language still could be advantageous To what extent do you agree or disagree

With the advent of the internet, numerous language translator softwares are emerged in terms of convenience of people’s lives. Several individuals suppose that thanks to these enumerated applications, the relevance of learning multiple languages has been faded step-by-step. However, in my point of view, i hold a strong belief that the language learning is still preserving their importance against those softwares.

To start with, it is undeniable that using translation software for communicating is extremely disadvantageous, especially when being ultilized for the reason that users step-by-step get into the habit of depending on these tools. A tourist, for instance, pay a visit to a nation whose language is distinctive from his or hers and need to ask an indigenous person for direction, the first sentiment that come into his/hers mind is definitely clicking one translation gadget in lieu of speaking directly which is less time-consuming. What's more, this method of conversing only applies to a tiny minority of instances who are affluent or privileged. For the impoverished civilians, with their minimum wage, they undoubtedly can not afford these softwares, thereby, grasping a language seems to be the only approach.

In addition, studying a second language creates a golden chance for human to be successful in the future life. The language acquisition allows them to integrate in the modern world with their all knowlegde, well information about culture, orgin of other countries. Ultimately, learning a language can help them lend a job such as tourguides or interpreters and even they may work for a multinational company in my country or find work abroad.

In conclusion, however avaible several translation tools are, having the knowledge of a second language is of paramount importance.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 306, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...-by-step. However, in my point of view, i hold a strong belief that the language ...
^
Line 3, column 534, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
... directly which is less time-consuming. Whats more, this method of conversing only ap...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, second, so, still, well, as to, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to start with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1539.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4768683274 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18528200535 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.658362989324 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.9617250335 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.909090909 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5454545455 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170028043986 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0650943145256 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0260518412234 0.0667982634062 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101819115232 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0333512656423 0.056905535591 59% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.99 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.