Some people hold a belief that despite the development of the cutting-edge software which help us translation, acquiring a new language naturally and broadening the horizon about new cultures is beneficial for all the individuals. I firmly agree with this idea because of theoretical and reality benefits of this proposal, particularly is we can make more sense of the cultural of the language of the country which you are learning and increasing more chances to apply more job opportunities which is appropriate for our abilities.
To begin with, one of the most significant when knowing a new language is people can acknowledge culture over the world. That is that translation software won’t be able to do. In the modern civilization society, becoming a global citizen is necessary, understanding and apply the cultural refinement over the world and to have a more nuanced perspective about the society. Moreover, it can make more choices in job opportuniaties for individuals to find an adequate and well-paid-jobs. When being in search of work, for instance, you can’t see any job that suitable with you in your country correspondingly proficiency in a new languages also is a big chance for you in terms of finding one.
Another advantage I can mention that you can boost your communicative skills. Of course that, If you are a bilingual, you can gain some level of respect eyes from another compared to monolingual. When having a conversation with a foreign friends, you will run a higher levels of confidence to communicate with them. Set my sister as an excellent example, she is initially that a monolingual, she didn't use to have the ability to communicate with foreign friends but after 2 years learning English, she has confident enough to speak fluently with them and even grabbing more chances to go abroad, she is going beyond her threshold level.
In conclusion, no matter how good that machine translation bring to us, I still claim that proficiency in languages plays an indispensible role in the modern-day.
- Task 2 Video records are a better way to learn about the way other people in the world live rather than written documents To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology of developing countries by charities in the US EU and other countries from 2006 to 2010 67
- The diagrams below show the site of a school in 2004 and the plan for changes to the school site in 2024 73
- The use of social media e g Facebook and Twitter is replacing face to face contact for many people in thier everyday life Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantage 89
- The charts below show the percentage of volunteers by organizations in 2008 and 2014 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 319, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e cultural refinement over the world and to have a more nuanced perspective about...
^^
Line 3, column 630, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'language'?
Suggestion: language
...ry correspondingly proficiency in a new languages also is a big chance for you in terms o...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 239, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'friend'?
Suggestion: friend
...en having a conversation with a foreign friends, you will run a higher levels of confid...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 397, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...he is initially that a monolingual, she didnt use to have the ability to communicate ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 403, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...initially that a monolingual, she didnt use to have the ability to communicate with...
^^^
Line 5, column 164, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n indispensible role in the modern-day.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, still, well, for instance, in conclusion, of course, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1703.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08358208955 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11617486329 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579104477612 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.64165418 49.4020404114 163% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.916666667 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.9166666667 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.91666666667 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157371740871 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0681288212317 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0677265750563 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0929300123001 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0212300753728 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 9.78957915832 204% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.