An American film actor John Wayne said Tomorrow is the most important thing in life How is it important for individuals and countries to think about the future rather than focus on the present What s your opinion

Essay topics:

An American film actor John Wayne said: “Tomorrow is the most important thing in life.” How is it important for individuals and countries to think about the future rather than focus on the present? What’s your opinion?

John Wayne's assertion, "Tomorrow is the most important thing in life," emphasizes the future-oriented way of thinking for individuals and nations. Although this idea may seem cliché, as the tendency to ponder over the future is rooted in human beings' evolutionary and psychological development, it can work wonders for human existence and the welfare of society if both individuals and nations apply a future-oriented notion.

As John Wayne suggests, casting one's gaze upon the horizon of the future enables individuals to create plans and set long-term goals to achieve the seemingly impossible and attain personal accomplishments. Elon Musk, a prime example of this forward-thinking approach, began with a clear goal in mind: envisioning the possibility of bringing people to Mars in the foreseeable future. Despite facing numerous obstacles during the early stages of his Mars exploration adventure, he successfully realized his dream after ten years, primarily due to his sheer determination and well-developed future-oriented plan that enabled him to make significant progress in his career. Thus, by planning ahead, one can outline coherent steps necessary to achieve small but incremental success and track progress, ultimately making a positive impact on their life in the long term. Therefore, this future-oriented mindset can instill perseverance and adaptability in individuals, allowing them to navigate an ever-changing world filled with hardships.
Likewise, countries can benefit from forward-thinking, as it helps them become better equipped to overcome difficulties and develop into wealthy nations. Developing countries can implement a set of strategic, long-term plans, such as education and workforce development. This approach ensures equal access to quality education and vocational training for all citizens, who will be better equipped with skills needed for high-paying jobs, thus reducing income inequality and fostering social mobility. Singapore's success story demonstrates the power of future-oriented thinking in achieving prosperity by implementing various visionary policies, such as stable governance and the rule of law, technology-focused innovation, education, and economic diversification. All of these plans, executed over the long term, have transformed Singapore from a small, resource-poor island into a global economic powerhouse with one of the highest GDP per capita in the world.

In conclusion, the notion of forward-thinking indeed benefits human existence and society overall. By adopting a future-oriented mindset, individuals and nations can strive for personal growth, sustainable development, economic equality, and global cooperation, leading to a more prosperous and harmonious world.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-05-10 chinh11111 89 view
2020-11-21 boem 71 view
Essays by user chinh11111 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 74, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...rrow is the most important thing in life,' emphasizes the future-oriented way of ...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, likewise, may, so, still, therefore, thus, well, in conclusion, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2368.0 1615.20841683 147% => OK
No of words: 393.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 6.02544529262 5.12529762239 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.50643149089 2.80592935109 125% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 176.041082164 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641221374046 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 739.8 506.74238477 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.3680296963 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 169.142857143 106.682146367 159% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0714285714 20.7667163134 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16371362249 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0591981407609 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0808234954441 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108965268462 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0744079175607 0.056905535591 131% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.0 13.0946893788 160% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 17.68 50.2224549098 35% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 7.44779559118 196% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.8 11.3001002004 158% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.99 12.4159519038 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.81 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 144.0 78.4519038076 184% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.7795591182 167% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.