An American film actor once said, “Tomorrow is important and precious”. Some
people think individuals and society should pay more attention to the future than to the present. Do you agree or disagree?
In this day and age, whether tomorrow is preponderant or not remains controversial. It is thought that humans should focus on the future rather than at the moment. Nevertheless, I contradict with the majority opinion and presume that the present is more paramount than the forthcoming and this essay will address the explanations for my viewpoint as follows.
To begin with, there are numerous compelling reasons why humans are more likely to pay attention to the coming years. Firstly, in the case of societies' issues with natural resources, humans can predict the depletion of these materials due to the overuse of restricted resources, and they may thus devise timely remedies to limit or locate alternate sources. Take fossil fuels such as coal and oil as examples, they will in the face of exhaustion and no longer exist. Therefore, researchers found alternative resources including solar, wind energy and it is supposed to be speared in over the world in the future. Additionally, when it comes to individuals, each person inclines to have their own long- standing goals. Should they want to achieve these ambitions, they will constitute appropriate plans. However, in the light of the future is mysterious and humans cannot predict exactly what will happen, focusing on the present is necessary.
By contrast, the importance of taking care of life at the moment is undeniable. It is conspicuous that the activities of the presence will have effects tomorrow. If people take good care of themselves in terms of skills, knowledge,... then they can easily accomplish the goals set in the future. Conversely, without trying now, it is useless to make plans for forthcoming. Furthermore, should they not want to be in the grips of natural disasters or reduction of natural resources, they will protect the environment and utilize humans’ resources in pertinent ways. Indeed, whatever plans humans prepare for the future are able to change.
To sum up, people should not only develop themselves in the present, but also make goals for the future.
- The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel s customer service The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010 56
- In their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasize that their products are new in some way Why is this Do you think it is a positive or negative development 78
- The two pie charts below show some employment patterns in Great Britain in 1992 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The maps give information about aa undetermined area 73
- The diagram shows Lakeside development between the years 2000 and 2009 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 231, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...themselves in terms of skills, knowledge,... then they can easily accomplish the g...
^^
Line 7, column 11, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...future are able to change. To sum up, people should not only develop themselve...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, thus, such as, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1727.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17065868263 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84187257563 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583832335329 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0686090598 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.9444444444 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5555555556 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124137432138 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0380612068198 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0343491038262 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0847704741503 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0265594821366 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.