Anybody can use a mobile phone to answer the work and personal calls at any time or 7 days a week. Does this development have more positive or negative effects on both individuals and society? Discuss both these views and give your own opinion
Everything has two sides and the mobile phone development is not an exception. While it is advantaged to answer calls no matter what the time is, I would argue that this evolution affects more negatively on personality and society.
It is true that there are some benefits in using mobile phone regularly for work and personality.Firstly, it will save much time instead of going out with friends or colleagues and talking to them, hence people can get more time to do other things. Secondly, people who have to work or study far from their homes or companies can communicate with families and co-workers more easily and quickly, moreover cell phone will help them reduce homesickness. Finally, using and paying the phone service will support economy for being in a good financial health and society will get better.
On the other hand, I believe that it is more disadvantaged for people to use cell phone because it can bring barriers to effective daily communication. In fact people could not transmit things fully such as emotion and mentality, then receivers decode messages hardly. For example, couples who are in long-distance relationships might break up with each other more quickly than others. Furthermore, answering the work at anytime by phone is quite critical because information and data are difficult to be saved for references latterly. In particular, if a promise is made in call, it can never be enforced because of no evidence. In addition, sometimes there are some trouble in transmitting signals between two phones so they cannot make humans hear clearly and lead to mistakes.
In a nutshell, it seems to me that the mobile phone progresses are likely to be negative with their significant effects if people continue to use their phones at any time or even a whole week.
- It has been believed that people who read for pleasure have developed imagination and language skills better than people who prefer to watch TV To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 88
- Computer technologies are more accessible and cheaper as the result more adults work at home and children study at home Is this a positive or negative development 75
- Early technological developments brought more benefits and changes to people’s life than the recent technological developments. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 95
- Anybody can use a mobile phone to answer the work and personal calls at any time or 7 days a week. Does this development have more positive or negative effects on both individuals and society? Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 90
- Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural andhistorical attractions. To what extent do you agree or disagree withthis opinion? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 98, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Firstly
...hone regularly for work and personality.Firstly, it will save much time instead of goin...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 262, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[3]
Message: The adverb 'hardly' is usually not used at the end of a sentence.
...ntality, then receivers decode messages hardly. For example, couples who are in long-d...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...s hear clearly and lead to mistakes. In a nutshell, it seems to me that the mob...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, while, for example, in addition, in fact, in particular, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1503.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84874046242 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616666666667 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.8065831028 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.25 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.1666666667 7.06120827912 215% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24985775706 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0876150343809 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0570405052379 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163850748051 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0364326064987 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.