Around the world, many adults are working from home, and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more accessible.
For the last few years, human beings have witnessed a booming development of technology with its application and expoitation in all aspects of life. Thanks to this, distance working and learning , in which people have their work and study done at home, are of great porpularity in the global scale. However, from my point of view, this trend bears on it more negative than positive meanings.
On the one hand, followers of this method of working and learning claim that it is beneficial in many ways. To begin with, by staying at home to work and study, people make a great contribution to the campaigns of pollution reduction. It cannot be denied that one of the biggest environmental pollutants is transportation. The volume of these items undoubtedly enjoys its upward trend if citizens limit their usage of traffic vehicles when they are not forced to go to thier office or educational institutions. Moreover, this limitation also enables people to save lots of money consumed in fuels for cars and motorbikes or ticket fares for public transports. This amount of savings may help reduce the financial burden on the breadwinners of their family.
On the other hand, I believe that its drawbacks, which outnumber its benefits, turn this trend into a negative one. At the first place, it is evident that advanced technology has provided mankind with numerous comforts, as well as mordern commodities, with which people can have their tasks or assignments finished anywhere without the necessity to be at workplace or school. Nevertheless, this deprives them of the opportunities to improve themselves with such core skills needed for your career or studying as interpersional communication skills, or group work skills. This , in turn, may make them less active and have bad impacts on their work. What's more, although people do not waste time on travelling or getting stuck in traffic jam, which gives them more time to finish their work, it does not neccessarily mean that they work as fast as when they are supported by someone else at office. Likewise, students may not be able to complete their exercises with the instruction and instant feedback from their teachers.
All things considered, despite some of distance working and learning's positive aspects, I maintain that it is better for people to get a seat at the office or school
- Extreme sports such as sky diving and skiing are very dangerous and should be banned To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view 78
- Many children find it difficult to concentrate on or pay attention to school 67
- The table and graph below give information about cinema attendance in Australia between 1994 and 2002 67
- Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person 11
- Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person Why do you think this is the case What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person Give reasons f 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 195, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...s to this, distance working and learning , in which people have their work and stu...
^^
Line 5, column 576, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ation skills, or group work skills. This , in turn, may make them less active and ...
^^
Line 5, column 650, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...ive and have bad impacts on their work. Whats more, although people do not waste time...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, likewise, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, well, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 24.0651302605 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1962.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 389.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04370179949 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79242429682 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586118251928 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 597.6 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.741372221 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.625 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3125 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140588044358 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0463345575918 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474645069872 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0883978804525 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0534512411999 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 195, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...s to this, distance working and learning , in which people have their work and stu...
^^
Line 5, column 576, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ation skills, or group work skills. This , in turn, may make them less active and ...
^^
Line 5, column 650, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...ive and have bad impacts on their work. Whats more, although people do not waste time...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, likewise, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, well, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 24.0651302605 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1962.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 389.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04370179949 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79242429682 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586118251928 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 597.6 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.741372221 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.625 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3125 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140588044358 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0463345575918 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474645069872 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0883978804525 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0534512411999 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.