Đề bài: Some people think scientific research should focus on solving world health problems. Others think that there are more important issues. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Some people assert that scientific research should concentrate on resolving world health problems, while others argue that there are more significant issues. From my perspective, I agree with the latter view.
Residents trust that researchers should cope with health phenomena. Firstly, when the health problem is tackled, people will have a long life expectancy. In fact, when researchers have suitable solutions to this problem, people can carry out those solutions, and then they have good health. Take myself as an example, when I contracted heart-related disease 4 years ago, I conducted a method of treating an illness from scientific researchers and I had better health for a long time. Secondly, health is everything for people. Specifically, if they have better health, they will do everything they want. Take my uncle as an example, he is 80 years old and now he can see that his daughter is getting married and having a stable job with positive emotions.
I believe that there are more significant problems. First and foremost, one of the other essential problems is environmental pollution. This is probably because if this problem is happened seriously by the people’s actions, people will be affected by the consequences of this issue so this problem needs to resolve quickly in order not to influence human health. Take myself as an example, because air pollution occurred in my village 2 years ago, I made a dangerous disease - heart-related disease and my health are extremely weak. Last but not least, one of the other necessary issues is food. To be more specific, food is a key factor in order to have good health. Because a lot of fetid food is purchased at the supermarket, people consume this food for a long time, and then they can take a risk of illness; therefore researchers need to solve the stale food problem in order not to impact people’s health. Take my sister as an example, because of using stale food at the market 3 years ago, she had food poisoning and she improved health quickly through useful advice from doctors.
All things considered, even though coping with health problems can bring a wealth of benefits, I trust that there are more significant problems in order to tackle them.
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environments such as the South pole Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 73
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environments such as the South pole Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 73
- In many countries government spent a large amount of money on improving internet access Why is it happening and do you think it is the most appropriate use of government money 61
- Nowadays more and more people decide to have children later in their life What are the reasons What are the effects on society and family life 73
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environments such as the South pole Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, while, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1862.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 373.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99195710456 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75619559247 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512064343164 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 565.2 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 2.10420841683 428% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.0299752322 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.444444444 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7222222222 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220113723017 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.080208444495 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0621146857927 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15795026568 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0643691149974 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, while, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1862.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 373.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99195710456 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75619559247 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512064343164 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 565.2 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 2.10420841683 428% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.0299752322 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.444444444 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7222222222 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220113723017 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.080208444495 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0621146857927 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15795026568 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0643691149974 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.