the graphs give information about TV shows screened in HN and HCM City from 1976 to 2006.
Given are the bar chart and line graph illustrating the data on TV shows screened in Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh city between 1976 and 2006.
Overall, it is evident that the USA shows accounted for the most shows screened in Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh City while the show admissions had a tendency to increase significantly in Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh City from 1985 to 2000.
A more detailed look at the bar chart reveals that the number of Australian shows screened took up at least in both Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh city, about 3 and 10. In contrast, the figures for USA shows became the most in those places, about 70 and 75. Afterward, the number of UK shows became second-ranked in Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh city, about 5 and 20.
Moving onto the line graph, it can be clearly seen that the number of admissions shows decreased slightly in Hanoi, about 9 thousand between 1975 and 1980 whereas those remained stable in Ho Chi Minh city, about 4 thousand from 1980 to 1985. The quantity of admission shows climbed considerably in both Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh city, about 1.5 thousand and 7 thousand from 1985 to 2000. In addition, the figure for admissions shows had a slight increase to 1.52 thousand between 2000 and 2005.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2022-05-19 | nguyễn nga | 67 | view |
2022-04-20 | unkownme2020@gmail.com | 78 | view |
2021-07-20 | rajpatel90 | 73 | view |
2021-05-25 | manuseth09 | 78 | view |
2021-03-15 | asmita acharya | 73 | view |
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environments such as the South pole Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 73
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environments such as the South pole Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 67
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environments such as the South pole Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 73
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environments such as the South pole Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 61
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environments such as the South pole Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 8, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are the bar chart and line graph illustrati...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Chi Minh city between 1976 and 2006. Overall, it is evident that the USA show...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Ho Chi Minh City from 1985 to 2000. A more detailed look at the bar chart re...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd Ho Chi Minh city, about 5 and 20. Moving onto the line graph, it can be cl...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, second, whereas, while, at least, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 993.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.47297297297 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38051449937 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.463963963964 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.0352182516 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.125 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.75 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 5.23603664747 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23598831684 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126654471443 0.103423049105 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0751295992366 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18307052624 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0704521100333 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.94 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.