The graph and chart below give information about species extinctions and the threats to plant life
Given is the line graph illustrating the data on extinct animals and plants from 2000 to 2100 while the pie chart presents the figures for threats to plant life.
Overall, it is evident that the extinction rate has increased from 2000 to 2060. Additionally, human impact is responsible for much more harm to plant life than natural events.
A more detailed look at the pie chart reveals that for people’s effect, plantations account for the least percentage, at 4.7% while agriculture has the highest proportion, at 18.7%. Besides, the data on harvesting is higher compared to development, at 14.4% and 10.4% respectively, and other human influences take up 5.4%. For natural events, the percentage of natural disasters is smaller than other natural events, at 7% and 11.2% correspondingly.
Moving onto the line chart, it can be clearly seen that between 2000 and 2020, the rate of species extinctions increased slightly from 5,000 million to 10,000 million while with the prediction from 2040 to 2060, the data on those species will grow rapidly, from 25.000 million to 50.000 million. Meanwhile, with the prediction from 2060 to 2100, the number of species extinctions will decrease steeply from 59,000 million to 30,000 million.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-25 | nguyễn nga | 56 | view |
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environments such as the South pole Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 73
- The bar chart below shows the numbers of men and women attending various evening courses at an adult education centre in the year 2009 The pie chart gives information about the ages of these course participants 73
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environments such as the South pole Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 73
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environments such as the South pole Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 73
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environments such as the South pole Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 72, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... chart reveals that for people’s effect, plantations account for the least percen...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, look, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1038.0 1615.20841683 64% => OK
No of words: 200.0 315.596192385 63% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 4.20363070211 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74852687817 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 176.041082164 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 506.74238477 55% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 16.0721442886 50% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.1096560528 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.75 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 7.06120827912 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162940635604 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0775157765351 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0894007227655 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126791108203 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104748619687 0.056905535591 184% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 78.4519038076 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.