Because some children don't have the natural ability to learn language, school should not force them to learn foreign language. Agree or disagree?
Learning languages is certainly a topic of debate. While many people believe that children who don’t have a talent for studying language should not be obliged to learn it, some think otherwise. In my opinion, learning new languages could bring about several benefits to those children in their academic and career paths.
Granted, one might argue that children should not be compelled to learn foreign languages. This is predicated on the assumption that those who don’t have natural ability must spend much time absorbing language-related concepts such as grammar, vocabulary, or sentence structure. Language lessons for them, therefore, would be tedious and dreary, which later can result in their absence from those classes or even the school. However, this line of reasons is not sound because not having a talent for a field doesn’t mean not having the ability to get success in that area. This is because by adjusting the approach to language study, the result, therefore, could be changed. For example, the conventional teaching style which is writing terms on the blackboard and force children to learn by heart could be changed to indirect learning with Youtube videos or films, which is far more appealing and attractive.
I am convinced that it is necessary for children to be required to study foreign languages because of several advantages it involved. First, by knowing different languages, children could approach a wide range of foreign documents that pertain to several subjects. This would help them a lot in doing research or comprehending some concepts. Furthermore, being able to use different languages open up more job opportunities for children in the future. For example, foreign companies which are likely to pay employees much money always set languages as one of the foremost requirements to be recruited. Knowing languages, therefore, become a must.
In conclusion, although one’s talent contributes to the ability to learn languages, it is possible to help children by modifying the approaches to that subject. It is worthy of the work and effort to study it, because of the benefits children could reap from it.
- The graph shows the number of marriages and divorces in the UK between 1975 and divorces in the UK between 1975 and 2000 67
- Some people say that marriages should be arranged by intermediaries Others say that young people should be free to choose their marriage partners Which viewpoint do you agree with 67
- An increase in production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment What are the causes and possible solutions 78
- In some countries many people are choosing to live alone nowadays than in the past Do you think it is a positive or negative development 89
- In some developed countries people become fat because they eat too much junk food Suggest some ways that governments and food companies can encourage people to stay fit and eat a healthy diet 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1812.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25217391304 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80522811335 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539130434783 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3783149423 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.588235294 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2941176471 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47058823529 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.406470995937 0.244688304435 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127797539732 0.084324248473 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0673589820305 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.250573692175 0.151304729494 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0933878876854 0.056905535591 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.