The best way for a country to prepare for the future is to invest more resources on young people. Do you agree and disagree?
For a nation to thrive in the future, some propose to invest greater resources to develop younger generations. I largely agree with them considering the youth’s vital role in the future workforce and their learning capacity. However, current issues should not be completely neglected.
The foremost rationale for my support for the government paying more attention to young people is the fact that they will be their country’s future workforce. If educated and trained adequately, they are likely to create national strength and prosperity. For example, the Chinese project “Future leaders”, which provided extensive support to potential students in the early 80s, produced thousands of leading figures in many fields including science, business and politics who later contributed to the country’s economic boom in the 2000s.
Another argument as for why I agree to prioritise investing in the youth is that they are faster learners. In comparison to older generations, young individuals tend to be more open-minded and enthusiastic in learning, and therefore can acquire new knowledge and skills more effectively. This can translate into a higher chance of employability and a reduced possibility of engaging in criminal acts or contributing to social instability.
Nevertheless, I acknowledge that governmental resources should also be dedicated to addressing ongoing issues. Failure in solving immediate social problems encompassing housing, poverty and inequality can have far-reaching consequences, potentially destabilizing a nation and resulting in a scarcity of resources needed for both immediate and long-term goals. Consequently, these circumstances may hinder the country’s ability to compete effectively on the global stage and impede its path to prosperity.
In conclusion, I mostly support the idea of the young receiving greater investment as they will become the main labour force and are more capable in learning even though current problems must also be addressed. That is why governments should develop a master plan to decide on the adequate amount of resources for these important projects.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-11 | nguyenkhangtriem | 84 | view |
- People in community can buy cheaper products nowadays Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 11
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities Others say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required 78
- The table below shows the percentages ofthe population by age groups in one town who rode bicycles in 2011 78
- The table below shows the percentages of the population by age groups in one town who rode bicycles in 2011 40
- Fewer and fewer people today right by hand using a pen pencil or brush What are the reasons Is this a positive or a negative development 11
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 159, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to even'
Suggestion: to even
... force and are more capable in learning even though current problems must also be ad...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, as for, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1819.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72012578616 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16542355044 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619496855346 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 567.9 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.9258917515 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.928571429 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7142857143 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286591874675 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0858320945985 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0778759607842 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14690396015 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0434206768899 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.54 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 159, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to even'
Suggestion: to even
... force and are more capable in learning even though current problems must also be ad...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, as for, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1819.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72012578616 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16542355044 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619496855346 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 567.9 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.9258917515 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.928571429 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7142857143 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286591874675 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0858320945985 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0778759607842 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14690396015 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0434206768899 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.54 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.