The best way to reduce youth crimes is to educate their parents with parental skills. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people believe the optimal solution to mitigate the crime rate of youthful citizens is to improve their parents’ ability to educate their offspring. Personally, I strongly advocate this sentiment which will be substantiated in the following essay.
To begin with, parents can strongly influence people during their childhood which play a pivotal role in determining their personalities. Naturally, infants tend to imitate their parents actions and attitudes, meaning that the way parents behave toward their kids can significantly shape their cognition and behaviors which last throughout their life and is almost impossible to be adjusted. Hence, it might be pernicious for kids to have agressive or ignorant parents as the vicious emotional and physical contact with their birthgiver during initial years might result in an unhealthy mentality which might fuel future delinquencies. Moreover, even if parents behave themselves but give inappropriate upbringings to their children at this phase, kids might still be detrimentally impacted. If children commit a wrongful action, for example aggressive violence with their peers, and their parents are unaware or overprotective of them, over time it might lead to a distorted mindset of kids believing their delinquent actions are rational which might incite children to engage in illegal activities in the future.
Therefore, parental skills among citizens who have children should receive more attention from law enforcers as the most effective way to reduce young crime rate. Firstly, as parents act as a frame that shapes children’s characteristics, good behavior can be imparted via appropriate and polite attitude of parents toward their offspring. Thus, parents should be able to ascertain signs of irrational behaviors in their children in order to improve them as they can pay a more holistic and regular attention to their kids than schools or the government. Furthermore, with good parenting skills, people would be able to give the essential lessons of laws to their children, for example, teaching them which actions are illegal. This can foster in kids an early perception and knowledge on society and legislation, preventing them from committing delinquent activities, thus helping children become law-abiding citizens when they grow up which can significantly diminish crime rate.
In conclusion, the potential that young citizens engage in crimes is predominantly prompted by the lack of parental education and attention in their childhood. Countries should invest more in improving parenting skills as its impact on kids can significantly alleviate crimes among young individuals.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-02 | hieuasroma@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-01 | vuhungbo | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-01 | vuhungbo | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-28 | chirag1234 | 61 | view |
| 2021-08-18 | lennie.butera | 84 | view |
- Many young people today change their jobs or careers every few years Do you think this has more advantages than disadvantages 78
- The best way to reduce youth crimes is to educate their parents with parental skills To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 73
- Throughout history people have dreamed of living in a perfect society but they have not agreed on what an ideal society would be like What do you think is the most important element of a perfect society in the modern world How can people work towards achi 78
- Should museums and art galleries be free of charge for the general public or should a charge even a voluntary one be levied for admittance Discuss this issue and give your opinion 82
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, thus, for example, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2279.0 1615.20841683 141% => OK
No of words: 401.0 315.596192385 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.68329177057 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97312292945 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551122194514 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 687.6 506.74238477 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.0513495422 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 162.785714286 106.682146367 153% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6428571429 20.7667163134 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.85714285714 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284955830815 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124398014214 0.084324248473 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0629199471694 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195926985528 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0133112788531 0.056905535591 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.6 13.0946893788 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.26 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.