Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.
To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
In modern society, the impact of unrecycled waste on the environment is at the forefront of public awareness. Many people, including me, reckon that the amount of processed rubbish is unsubstantial, thus postulating the government to consider recycling waste a legal requirement. In this essay, I will substantiate why laws are needed to make people recycle more.
First, by establishing laws requiring people to treat rubbish, the government can improve each individual's awareness of protecting the environment and being responsible for processing waste. Admittedly, an official law might affect social attitudes toward treating rubbish since it is obligatory, which means disposing of the unrecyclable waste is illegal, and treating personal waste is a compulsory request. For example, in Japan and Korea, it is mandatory to categorize rubbish into several types before delivering it to factories, which supports the process of treating civilian waste. Moreover, a law can motivate recycling activities and promote an environmentally friendly lifestyle in the community since people are more concerned about their rubbish to avoid law violations and severe monetary fines.
Secondly, by creating official laws, the authorities can ratify a plethora of policies to compel citizens to recycle and be conscious of the conservation of the environment. Concerning the actual efficiency, budgetary retribution is more effective than other remedies as people might notice and adhere to legislation with pecuniary punishment instead of propaganda campaigns which are pointless and straining on the national budget. Due to the obligation to recycle rubbish, policymakers can give the disobedient heavy penalties acting as a deterrent against the breach of laws and enhancing social behavior. Additionally, the government can promulgate several acts to curb the amount of unrecyclable rubbish disposed into the habitat as long as constraining the overconsumption of long-term hazardous waste, thus enacting some incentive policies to motivate citizens to recycle more which can improve the social concern to the environment.
In conclusion, legislation is an indispensable factor to enhance people's attitudes toward recycling rubbish and creating a sustainable environment. The government should implement laws and policies properly and gradually to prevent the habitat from being infested by human disposal.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-29 | nobitaa | 84 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | ThHuong | 61 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | ThHuong | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-19 | paniz_kiani | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-19 | paniz_kiani | 56 | view |
- Many young people today change their jobs or careers every few years Do you think this has more advantages than disadvantages 78
- Throughout history people have dreamed of living in a perfect society but they have not agreed on what an ideal society would be like What do you think is the most important element of a perfect society in the modern world How can people work towards achi 78
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 73
- The best way to reduce youth crimes is to educate their parents with parental skills To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Should museums and art galleries be free of charge for the general public or should a charge even a voluntary one be levied for admittance Discuss this issue and give your opinion 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 96, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...ubbish, the government can improve each individuals awareness of protecting the environment...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2060.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.85227272727 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2013957361 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559659090909 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 660.6 506.74238477 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.7969570879 49.4020404114 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.461538462 106.682146367 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0769230769 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.15384615385 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266493411525 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101831018676 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.070504147355 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178153698918 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0681213416095 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.7 13.0946893788 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 18.69 50.2224549098 37% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.4 11.3001002004 154% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.95 12.4159519038 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.67 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 78.4519038076 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.