The best way to solve the world's environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Raising the petrol price is believed to be the best solution to alleviate environmental issues. From my point of view, this is not the most optimal way as it may detrimentally impact the global economy that depends much on fuel and I suppose that creating environmental social awareness would be a more effective approach.
On the one hand, to some extent, a surge in fuel prices positively impacts the habitat on the Earth. First and foremost, it may decrease demand for vehicles using this kind of energy, thus reducing harmful emissions that pollute the atmosphere. Indeed, once the expense per kilometer soars to an unaffordable level, commuters will resort to cheaper means of transportation, such as bikes, buses, or electric vehicles, which remarkably lowers the level of exhausted fume amount released into the air. Furthermore, the governments can impose tax on fuel purchases to fund environmental conservation programs. As done in many countries, this ensures that the general population’s demand for petrol can facilitate the restoration of pollution damage caused by fuel emission.
However, I still opine that an increase in fuel prices can only solve a limited part of the complex environmental issues and it even may pose a crisis to the global economy. To be more specific, the causes of pollution are diverse, involving the use of plastic bags in shopping or chemicals used in both agriculture and industry which contaminate air, water, and land. Therefore, the most effective option would be running a worldwide campaign that raises consumer awareness about the environmental cost of their shopping habits and presses companies to reduce the consumption of poisonous chemicals and resolve to greener cultivating and manufacturing methods. Moreover, if fuel becomes more expensive, transportation costs will experience upward fluctuation, and businesses bear the brunt of this impact, which causes them to raise the price of goods and services. Consequently, the economy would undergo inflation and discontentment would appear among the population.
In conclusion, it is justifiable to say that increasing the price of fuel partly addresses air pollution. Nevertheless, I suppose the economy can face a crisis because of the frenzy of upward petrol price fluctuation. Meanwhile, a comprehensive global campaign to convey education and regulation is the most superior resolution for environmental problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-21 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-02-21 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-02-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-02-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 84 | view |
| 2024-02-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 84 | view |
- Many people believe that scientific research should be carried out and controlled by governments rather than private companies To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people say free time activities for children should be organized by parents Others say that children should be free to choose what they do in their free time Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
- More people put their personal information online address telephone number for everyday activities such as socializing on social networks or banking Do you think it is a positive or negative development 89
- In some countries people are having children at later age in life What are the reasons Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages 89
- In some countries people are having children at a later age in life What are the reasons Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, thus, while, i suppose, in conclusion, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2070.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 370.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59459459459 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.48241538974 2.80592935109 124% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597297297297 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 655.2 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.9453825485 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.0 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145655822386 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0494210947729 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0416934048221 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0889515142891 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0204576139506 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.29 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 78.4519038076 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.