The best way to solve the world's environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuels. Do you agree or disagree?
It is sometimes argued that reducing the usage of fossil fuels by increasing the price is the most efficient way to tackle the Earth’s environment pollution. While raising the cost of fuels is one effective solution, I disagree that such method is not the best way to solve these environmental problems.
On the one hand, there are some benefits of supplying fuels with higher price. With this method, the consumers will seize to buy too much gas fuels. Thus, they will have to find another alternative such as electricity which is more environmental friendly and comes with cheaper price. Another benefit of raising the gas’ price is to take more money from the individuals who prefer using fossil fuels. This fund can then be put into constructing air filtering systems which filter the exhausted fumes from the atmosphere.
On the other hand, there are some other methods to stop people from using too much gas instead of increasing the cost. Firstly, the governments from around the world can work together to establish some global events to encourage people to reduce the amount of fuels they use. The global effect of such events is an important factor to get the consumers’ attention, which has a big impact on the world’s environment protection. Secondly, teaching children the problems that the environment are facing is also a great solution. With good education from young ages, people can have a concept of protecting the environment in their own areas. Thus, this method will greatly reduce pollution in the future.
In conclusion, I believe increasing the price of fuels is not the best way to solve pollution problems. Instead, collaboration between governments and education will have a bigger impact on protecting the Earth’s environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-05 | jessica1522 | 61 | view |
- Write a letter to your friend who is starting an import/export business and asked you for a recommendation for a product from your own country. In the letter, you should:•What the product will be•From which region of your country where it came from• 78
- Scientists predict in the near future cars will be driven by computers, not people. Why? Do you think it is a positive or negative development? 91
- Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language. Do you think this is a positive or negative social development? 73
- A report indicated that many children between 7 and 11 spend too much time watching television and playing videos game How does this problem affect children What measures can be taken to control it 88
- Some people think that the media (newspapers) have the right to publish details of people’s private life, while other’s think it should be controlled. Discuss both views. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, second, secondly, so, then, thus, while, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1503.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20069204152 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86205399545 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536332179931 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.5785691112 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.2 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2666666667 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.93333333333 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213765758773 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0701181158065 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0723869380695 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154384762187 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.081304739374 0.056905535591 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.