A big salary is much more important than job satisfaction. Do you agree or disagree?
It is often argued that it is more advantageous to choose a job with a high wage, even if you have no intention about it. I completely agree with this opinion and think that well-paid jobs are much more influential than satisfaction ones.
Firstly, I believe that a high-wage job plays an important role in solving personal affairs mostly, which satisfaction cannot guarantee. If someone has a well-paid job this means this person has the ability to solve quiet problems, enjoy his life and even contribute to society by donation, which no job satisfaction can guarantee. For instance, a lot of wealthy individuals made their own decisions that looking at a high salary job, they have good conditions which are chances to approach their satisfaction as a part-time job or particularly hobbies without risks. That is why it is more important to choose a high-salary job that makes society better.
Secondly, having good conditions brings opportunities and therefore leads to career growth. In other words, there is a strong relationship between money and big-salary jobs. People cannot live without money, which is essential for survival and a good living. You cannot finish your assignments with a hungry stomach. In some circumstances, well-paid jobs provide enormous amounts of money which give people opportunities to experience other financial sectors to find out extra incomes, approaching eligible paid lessons is one of the disadvantages that job satisfaction could not cope with. For example, many people opt to have a high-wage job, not because of satisfying feelings egotistically, but because they are willing to have a better life. Thus, the advantages of well-paid jobs far outweigh the demerits of job satisfaction in the long-term perspective.
To sum up, I strongly believe that a big salary job is more beneficial than satisfaction because it makes life better.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-17 | Kha Linh | 61 | view |
| 2024-12-17 | Kha Linh | 61 | view |
| 2024-12-14 | Sang Sang Sang | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-13 | Sang Sang Sang | 78 | view |
| 2024-12-08 | ankushgurumaa | 78 | view |
- Are teenagers nowadays addicted to social media Why or Why not 82
- It is better for children to grow up in the countryside than in a big city Do you agree or disagree Use specific reasons and examples to develop your essay 56
- A big salary is much more important than job satisfaction Do you agree or disagree 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, in other words, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1588.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2582781457 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03098626993 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572847682119 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.7602352262 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.428571429 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.14285714286 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319604394798 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118066124371 0.084324248473 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0901014257682 0.0667982634062 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229259548004 0.151304729494 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0634136812227 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.