It is better for children to grow up in the countryside than in a big city. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to develop your essay.
Some people tend to believe that it is better for children to grow up in the countryside than in a big city. Personally, I do not agree with that assertion, because there are more benefits for children living in metropolitan areas than for children living in rural areas.
Firstly, children have certain advantages of living in a large city. Because they will have numerous chances to develop and technology science. This means that they will have more employment opportunities in the future and will expand their skills more easily. Moreover, children will also have different ways of spending their leisure time. There are plenty of theaters, concerts, play stations and other types of entertainment.
Secondly, medical institutions are a problem that requires care. If children live in the village, it is not easy for medical establishments to get good supplies to treat illnesses. Therefore, children have to move away to the cities to get better treatment. Besides, there are numerous supermarkets, large banks in the city. The services of supermarkets, department stores and shops throughout the city where they can buy all sorts of merchandise are very wonderful.
In conclusion, there are numerous benefits to living in a major city. The benefits mentioned above bring more benefits not only to the lives of children, but also to everybody.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-20 | tuyetnhung3269 | 56 | view |
- It is better for children to grow up in the countryside than in a big city Do you agree or disagree Use specific reasons and examples to develop your essay 56
- A big salary is much more important than job satisfaction Do you agree or disagree 78
- Are teenagers nowadays addicted to social media Why or Why not 82
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1140.0 1615.20841683 71% => OK
No of words: 218.0 315.596192385 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22935779817 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 4.20363070211 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87936039246 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 176.041082164 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564220183486 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 361.8 506.74238477 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.3181005594 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.4285714286 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5714285714 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195381111361 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0645761159046 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0922153675822 0.0667982634062 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124102690402 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126063507622 0.056905535591 222% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 78.4519038076 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.