Biotechnology companies all over the world are developing different types of genetically modified (GM) crops. However, not enough is known about these crops on our health and the environment. Interfering with nature in this way should be prohibited. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Biotechnology companies all over the world are developing different types of genetically modified (GM) crops. However, not enough is known about these crops on our health and the environment. Interfering with nature in this way should be prohibited. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Different kinds of genetically modified food are developed by many biotechnology manufacturers all over the world due to its positive impacts. In my opinion, however, I strongly believe that interfering with nature in this way should be forbidden because of its side effects on our health and the environment.
On the one hand, there are a variety of reasons leading to the use of many companies on this method. Firstly, these crops will grow bigger and faster and be more resistant to diseases, insects and weather conditions better than commodity used conventional method. This could be vital in production process in developing countries. For example, oranges with a gene from spinach will be resistant to a tiny insect harming citrus trees. Secondly, GM foods can be modified to look perfect, which in turn help them become much more appealing to customers. Therefore, interfering with nature in this way will result in higher profits and higher living standards of farmers.
On the other hand, I suppose that authorities should apply prohibition policy owing to its detrimental risks on the environment and human’s health. Food chains would be broken if crops are resistant to predators. From an environmental perspective, crops might change the whole ecosystem. Furthermore, as genetically-modified food often utilize chemicals such as fertilizers and pesticides, the environment worldwide is likely to be seriously affected.
In conclusion, although many biotechnology companies are in favor of enhancing genetically modified food, I personally reckon that these kinds of crops exert pernicious impacts upon people’s health and the environment so government should put a ban on this methodology.
- Biotechnology companies all over the world are developing different types of genetically modified (GM) crops. However, not enough is known about these crops on our health and the environment. Interfering with nature in this way should be prohibited. To wh 84
- As countries have developed there has been a trend towards smaller family sizes.Why does this happen?How does this affect society? 78
- The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose, and can even be damaging. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- “People living in large cities today face many problems in their everyday life. What are these problems? Should governments encourage people to move to smaller regional towns?” 73
- Crime is a big problem in the world; many believe that nothing can be done to prevent it. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give your own opinion. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Genetically
genetically modified GM crops are regarded as an in...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ood shortage and famine worldwide. Second, cultivating GM plants could bene...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, if, may, regarding, second, so, therefore, while, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1686.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.79381443299 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11307584979 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652920962199 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6216598325 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.692307692 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3846153846 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.15384615385 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173784365607 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0634974730118 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0451796128685 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114605582181 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0522555830109 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.6 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.97 8.58950901804 128% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.