In Britain, when someone gets old they often go to live in a home with
other old people where there are nurses to look after them. Sometimes
the government has to pay for this care.
Many people say family shoud pay rather than government.
How far do you agree or disagree with this statement?
The trend of living in old age homes is becoming common where old people are taken care by the hired nurses. This care is funded by the law makers in many countries. Even though many would believe it to be family's primary duty to pay for this service, I assert, government must take a charge of this.
Primarily, it should be the law makers' fundamental duty that they need to reciprocate financially and by any other possible means to pay off grey-haired people who have served their country throughout their lives. This means that by being productive members of the society, the dedication and hard work contributed to make country better and developed. Hence, the higher authorities owe these aged people to financial subsidize for the taxes and services they gave at their young age by paying Provident fund, GST tax on items they buy. The repayment by government to these old people can be done by giving them medical insurance, a senior citizen card to get any basic services ranging from day to day grocery shopping, monthly electricity bill, and transportation cost either at free of cost or at very economical prices if possible.
In contrast, some people might think that governments generally have plethora of responsibilities on their shoulders already than focusing merely on subsidizing golden age people. Since many governments strive to make sure to fund infrastructure, public health services, educational fields and so forth, it tends to become a job of other family members now. To elaborate, older people generally save money or property for their later age which their family members keep, so these close family people must be made liable to pay any expenses made on looking after their old people. Let alone this practical and financial aspect, even, on the basis of moral values and humanitarian grounds, family members ought to pay for the care of old people.
In conclusion, despite having a view of one school of thoughts which make it obligation for families to pay for their old ones, I firmly have a perspective that it is an utmost job of any government to give funding for a take-care of their old citizens than leaving it on their families.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-24 | ankushelixir09 | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-24 | ankushelixir09 | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-24 | ankushelixir09 | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-24 | ankushelixir09 | 78 | view |
| 2021-03-10 | rajpatel90 | 56 | view |
- Some people believe that advertisement is useful and informative Others think it is false and only helps to raise prices Discuss both views give your opinion 89
- These days most of the students oppose discipline as something something super imposed on them Do you support or oppose this idea 82
- In Britain when someone gets old they often go to live in a home with other old people where there are nurses to look after them Sometimes the government has to pay for this care Many people say family shoud pay rather than government How far do you agree 78
- Some people think that public libraries are no longer important while others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
- In Britain when someone gets old they often go to live in a home with other old people where there are nurses to look after them Sometimes the government has to pay for this care Many people say family shoud pay rather than government How far do you agree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 167, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., I firmly have a perspective that it is an utmost job of any government to give ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, look, so, in conclusion, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1813.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 368.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92663043478 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70409655402 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565217391304 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.5242228231 49.4020404114 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.083333333 106.682146367 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.6666666667 20.7667163134 148% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319621186651 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123237376738 0.084324248473 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546119515422 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21606218076 0.151304729494 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0598103695679 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 50.2224549098 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.91 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.