Children benefit more from playing outdoors with other children than from playing computer games indoors on their own. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Many a person holds the opinion that it is more beneficial for children to profit from taking part in outdoor activities with other peers than from amusing themselves by playing indoor video games. Personally, I partially concur with this notion, and this essay is aimed at providing compelling justification for my position.
On the one hand, there are a number of different explanations to be taken into account as to why youngsters take advantage of playing outdoors with other players more than entertaining themselves with computer games indoors. For one thing, this might result in children’s comprehensive physical and mental development. By and large, not only the powerful skeletal and muscular systems but also the immune ones are assisted to enhance by appropriate outdoor activities on the grounds that children tend to exercise more while they are playing with their peers. For another, the fact that children tend to have a boundless love of the environment deserves consideration. The young are exposed to natural surroundings to observe and interact directly with lively flora and animals instead of watching them on television or are illustrated tediously through books and pictures, with the result that they are conscious to love the environment and protect their natural habitat.
On the other hand, there are also some considerable advantages for them to enjoy video games indoors for several reasons. To begin with, granted that these games are distributed online or offline appropriately by the age and kind of players under a lot of strict government’s regulations, they are highly esteemed as a safe amusement for children. Another important factor for video games’ benefits is that they are proved to be able to assist children in boosting at least their linguistic intelligence, creation and reflection competence by prestigious medical scientists. Given the fact that players are practically required to combine the interaction of their eyes, ears, hands and brain to conquer game challenges, these intentional interactions can foster the growth of children effectively.
In conclusion, I take the position that while to some extent children take more advantages of playing outdoors with other friends, there are also some signìicant profits for them to enjoy video games indoors for the reasons mentioned above.
- In education and employment some people work harder than others Why do some people work harder Is it always a good thing to work hard 73
- Some people think that the best way to reduce crime is to give longer prison sentences Others however believe there are better alternative ways of reducing crime Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- More and more people are finding it increasingly important to wear fashionable clothes Is this attitude to wearing clothes a positive or negative development 84
- In many countries fast food is becoming cheaper and more widely available Do the disadvantages of this outweigh the advantages 89
- Children benefit more from playing outdoors with other children than from playing computer games indoors on their own To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 19, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r natural habitat. On the other hand, there are also some considerable advanta...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while, as to, at least, in conclusion, kind of, by and large, for one thing, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1992.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 367.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42779291553 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93214852453 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553133514986 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 616.5 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.5906009983 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 166.0 106.682146367 156% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.5833333333 20.7667163134 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6666666667 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.371801332137 0.244688304435 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136546030839 0.084324248473 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0858789242348 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241725227739 0.151304729494 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0628686581149 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.4 13.0946893788 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.57 50.2224549098 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.81 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.