Some young people are leaving the countryside to live in cities and towns, leaving only old people in the countryside. Why do you think this is? Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
Many developing countries around the world have been encountering a knotty problem of more and more migration of the youth from rural to urban areas to find better paradises for work and life. In addition, by virtue of this fact, the countryside is in shortage of the young but abundance of the old. This essay is first aimed at pointing some reasons why this matter exists and then will be examining whether it is a favourable social change or a converse one.
To begin with, there are a number of different explanations to be taken into account as to why this matter draws many attention from the mass media and governments. For one thing, this fact might result in the rapid rises in the urbanization rates recently causing alarming imbalances of well-equipped facilities as well as the general development among urban and rural areas in countries. By and large, the young employment-to-be could take diversified career opportunities in metropolitan areas on the ground that there are not only a variety of universities and vocational colleges but also manufacturers, industrial parks for them to facilitate and foster the growth of their learning and working path there better than in their indigent hometowns. For another, the fact that youngsters would like to assert themselve and escape from their past poverty by means of dynamic environment and higher people’s intellect standard in metropolises deserves consideration. They could take full advantage of these conditions to acquire well-education and valuable chances to enhance their attitude and skills in a competitive labor force, with the result that they are capable of earning their livelihoods on their own account and partially providing financial support to their family in their hometown.
It is likewise worth mentioning several drawbacks of this issue. Granted that most young people tend to flood into big cities to study and look for jobs, this leads to a wasteful abundance in the workforce and unemployment increases, meanwhile, the agricultural lands in countrysides are no longer cultivated due to scarcity of heirs having a passionate interest in farming. Another major drawback is negative effects on infrastructure, environment and the social security system in these cities. Given the fact that current systems and public facilities, namely roads, social housing, schools and hospitals, could not go on tolerating too many immigrants from other regions, they would probably become vulnerable victims of uncontrolled urbanization in forthcoming years.
In conclusion, the urbanization acceleration in many countries along with desperate desire for a good quality of life is among some possible rationales behind this social trend. As a result based on the aforementioned discussion, the impact of the flow of young people to urban areas can be a mixed blessing.
- More and more people are finding it increasingly important to wear fashionable clothes Is this attitude to wearing clothes a positive or negative development 84
- In education and employment some people work harder than others Why do some people work harder Is it always a good thing to work hard 73
- Some people think that the best way to reduce crime is to give longer prison sentences Others however believe there are better alternative ways of reducing crime Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Children benefit more from playing outdoors with other children than from playing computer games indoors on their own To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- In education and employment some people work harder than others Why do some people work harder Is it always a good thing to work hard 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 114, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun attention seems to be countable; consider using: 'many attentions'.
Suggestion: many attentions
...nto account as to why this matter draws many attention from the mass media and governments. Fo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, likewise, look, so, then, well, while, as to, in addition, in conclusion, in short, as a result, as well as, by and large, for one thing, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 10.4138276553 211% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 74.0 41.998997996 176% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2405.0 1615.20841683 149% => OK
No of words: 450.0 315.596192385 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34444444444 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6057793516 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03884399723 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 263.0 176.041082164 149% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584444444444 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 756.9 506.74238477 149% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 32.0 20.2975951904 158% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 85.8257905675 49.4020404114 174% => OK
Chars per sentence: 171.785714286 106.682146367 161% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.1428571429 20.7667163134 155% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.3571428571 7.06120827912 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15341634342 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0595400545535 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0521470612508 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101701646242 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349565226389 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.8 13.0946893788 151% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.54 50.2224549098 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 11.3001002004 150% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.17 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 141.0 78.4519038076 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.1190380762 146% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.