Children nowadays watch significantly more television than those in the past, which reduces their activity levels accordingly.
In fact, television has become an integral feature of almost every household in the word. Therefore, children undoubtedly spend more time watching TV than previous generations and less time outdoors, I am convinced that there are certain reasons for this phenomenon, and that some possible/ feasible solutions can be taken to encourage/ motivate children to be more physically active.
Firstly, televisions/ television sets have become much more accessible thanks to the discount/ reduction in television prices. Besides, the increase in the number as well as the improvement in the quality of interesting TV programs targeting children, such as cartoons, attracts a huge number of children viewers. Another reason for the rise in television viewing is related to the amount of time that children have. Due to studying nearly all day long, children are simply too tired to go out or play sports, but watch television.
Nevertheless, it is significant that children spend enough time to play outdoors. One measure which can be taken to enhance children to be active is spending time for outdoor activities with them, as regards ice-skating or going to the sea for a swim. Besides, running exciting open-air physical activities or camps for kids is another way to encourage young children to get more involved in activities. Similarly, schools can run physical education classes as a part of their curriculum to ensure that recommended levels of physical activities are completed every day. Lastly, television can bring awareness - raising programs and ideas of physical activities on their broadcasts.
In general, the discount on TVs and high-quality programs for children together with the volume of time that children have poses (contributes to) the problem. However, as discussed above, nowadays, there are a number of initiatives that can help combat the problems of increasing television viewing and reducing physical activities in children.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-25 | eyraen | 73 | view |
| 2021-06-27 | Ngoc170804 | 84 | view |
| 2020-10-12 | Bùi Thanh Hà | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-24 | GM_jurabek | 100 | view |
| 2017-07-25 | doha | 85 | view |
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999 11
- The line graph below shows the average daily maximum temperatures for Auckland and Christchurch two cities in New Zealand and London and Edinburgh two cities in the United Kingdom 67
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999
- Children nowadays watch significantly more television than those in the past which reduces their activity levels accordingly 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, lastly, nevertheless, similarly, so, therefore, well, as regards, in fact, in general, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1646.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43234323432 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94254039481 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580858085809 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.0833238361 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.615384615 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3076923077 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4615384615 7.06120827912 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279348868838 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0979135511098 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.031503130587 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165352904366 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0270700461166 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.