The matter of watching TV too much on youngster has been a great concern of many people in recent years. This problems has resulted in three main consequences which will be discussed in the following essay. Besides, some possible ways to tackle this matter will also be mentioned.
The acute problem of wasting time watching TV of children has led to some major issues as follows. The first block stumbling block is eye problems. For instance, spending excessively time paying attention to watch TV can lead to eyestrain, short-sight or astigmatism,... Another daunting matter that counts is youngster can easily get autistic because of staying at home all day long to watch TV. To illustrate, there are many cases that children addict to watch TV will make them become lazy, feel safe with the television or even get social phobia. The final heinous consequence that could be mentioned is waste too much time. Obviously, youngster may waste their valuable time instead of having their own real-life experiences, it can help children to gain more knowledge than only watching TV at home.
Due to the serious aftermaths mentioned above, these problems should be averted immediately by the following remedies. The first feasible approach would be organize more activities in schools or neighborhood. School and parents should cooperate to give the solutions and create many festivals, reality experiences for children in order to draw their attention. Another way to address the matter of this issue is allow youngster to watch TV in certain time and educate them about bad effects of watch tv too much. Once children comprehend the adverse implication of spending too much time watching TV, they will change their mind and restrict it.
In conclusion, children watch TV too often have been caused by their curious and exciting. Only by creating opportunity for youngster to have playground, will this matter be incurred properly.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 106, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: These
...concern of many people in recent years. This problems has resulted in three main con...
^^^^
Line 1, column 120, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'have', 'haven'.
Suggestion: have; haven
...y people in recent years. This problems has resulted in three main consequences whi...
^^^
Line 3, column 267, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...to eyestrain, short-sight or astigmatism,... Another daunting matter that counts i...
^^
Line 5, column 413, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'allowed'.
Suggestion: allowed
... to address the matter of this issue is allow youngster to watch TV in certain time a...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 38, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[7]
Message: The adverb 'often' is usually put between 'have' and 'been'.
Suggestion: have often been
... In conclusion, children watch TV too often have been caused by their curious and exciting. O...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, if, may, so, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1624.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17197452229 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71489297018 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585987261146 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.4304952818 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5294117647 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4705882353 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.64705882353 7.06120827912 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.394251544734 0.244688304435 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126993046357 0.084324248473 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10605283108 0.0667982634062 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238240230684 0.151304729494 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10416882443 0.056905535591 183% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.