Children spend too much time watching TV nowadays. What are problems and solutions?
Television is one of humanity's most important inventions in the past century but the children growing up with this technological advance is spending endless hours on. This essay will discuss the problem of watching TV and recommend some remedies for this hassle.
First of all, television prevents children from thinking independently and creatively. Watching TV is a passive way to obtain knowledge. Children only receive information from one aspect without questioning about the right or wrong of this entropy. In the second place, some television programs contain negative contents. It encompasses graphical images such as shooting, stabbing and beheading. Researchers claim that kids may imitate actions depicted on TV and commit juvenile crime. Lastly, watching the broadcast too much is not good for health. Binge watching is detrimental to the eyes and is also a major cause of myopia. Television is also responsible for causing obesity, high blood pressure and different kinds of vascular diseases.
There are some solutions to cut down on TV time. First answer to the problem is taking the child on a day trip. Having a picnic helps keep children away from the screen and stimulate their curiosity to nature. Moreover, it also improves the bonding of the family. Secondly, setting a fixed schedule on leisure time also reducing binge watching. Parents should create a goal to limit TV usage to less than three hours. Parents play an important role in introducing their children to proper lifestyles. Finally, reducing the children's interest on TV through removing their favorite channel and introducing them to other type of pastimes also lowers viewing time.
In conclusion, watching television may put the independence and creative thinking of children in jeopardy, make children susceptible to social evil and ruin their health. Parents should cut down on TV time through proper parental guidance
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-10-11 | YESWANTH KALUVA | 67 | view |
2022-09-06 | vla2407 | 89 | view |
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment only governments and large companies can make a difference To what extent do you agree or disagree 57
- Many young people who leave school hold a negative attitude towards learning Why does this happen What are the solution 84
- People have little understanding of the importance of the natural world What are the reasons and how can people learn more about the natural world 84
- Most people have forgotten the meaning behind traditional or religious festivals during festival periods people nowadays only want to enjoy themselves To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 56
- Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians not individuals as individuals can do too little To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, lastly, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, in conclusion, such as, first of all, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1614.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36212624585 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77193901013 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614617940199 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.2526996763 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.8571428571 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.3333333333 20.7667163134 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295825707488 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0744400948567 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0610627934268 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162310674952 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0162111774762 0.056905535591 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.