It is suggested that primary children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
It is irrefutable that the primary school stage plays a determining role in shaping the core personality and disposition toward the life of a child, thereby, establishing an appropriate curriculum has been a matter of controversy for quite sometimes. Hence, several people these days support the idea that planting and raising animals should be taught at primary school for children'sake. From my perspective, while there are certain drawbacks, its benefits are much more considerable.
On the one hand, one could claim that learning about growing vegetables and keeping animals may detrimental to youngsters. One fundamental justification is that primary-school children are too immaturity to have exposure to wildlife creatures. It does not seem unreasonable to suggest that with an underdeveloped immune system, children are spectacularly vulnerable to infectious diseases, thereby, doing tasks related to nature may make attribution to worsening the condition. The Feline Leukemia Virus found on cats, which possibly poses a serious threat to their young owners, can be a suitable case in point. Furthermore, responsibility is the prerequisite when taking care of living things. Unfortunately, since the majority of children are often lack of this characteristic, it might be a burdensome task for the kids and they may end up unintentionally killing these miserable creatures by forgetting to feed and water
Nevertheless, there is a variety of advantageous impacts that these given activities bring to children. First and foremost, they foster various personal qualities deep inside a child. It does not seem unreasonable to suggest that by looking after flora or fauna, children gain a greater sense of responsibility and internalise the real-world effects of their negligence or dedication. Another explanation to support this is that these activities may be credited to improve vital skills of children. There seems to be evidence that not only children learn the practical skills required to own a pet, such as cleaning out the cage, grooming and teaching tricks but they also accomplish the abilities of communication. By the way of exemplifying, children befriend pets and hence, share all their happiness and sorrow with them without the fear of being judged
In conclusion, despite the fact that children may get sick from infectious diseases or accidentally kill the animals or plants they keep, applying these activities on the primary school curriculum can nurture several personality traits and social skills that necessary for the child
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-25 | Nina Tsarevich | 56 | view |
| 2023-07-24 | pwlihnkt | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-09 | hieu13092006 | 78 | view |
| 2022-12-07 | yufdtrdfyt | 67 | view |
| 2022-06-08 | quytnee | 78 | view |
- It is observed that in many countries not enough students are choosing to study science What are the causes And what will be effects on society 73
- What are the possible effects of living long on an individual and on the whole society 83
- The migration of people to cities is one of the biggest problems facing the world s cities today Discuss the main causes What solutions can be used to tackle the situation 73
- In some countries around the world men and women are having children late in life What are the reasons for this development What are the effects on society and family life 73
- Many animal species are becoming extinct due to human activities on land and in sea What are the reasons for this and what can be doen to solve this issue 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 927, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...reatures by forgetting to feed and water Nevertheless, there is a variety of adva...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, if, look, may, nevertheless, so, while, in conclusion, such as, by the way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2171.0 1615.20841683 134% => OK
No of words: 393.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52417302799 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18961183464 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 176.041082164 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610687022901 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 676.8 506.74238477 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 99.0614373374 49.4020404114 201% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 155.071428571 106.682146367 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0714285714 20.7667163134 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208977583546 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0606984525638 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0548016887218 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114331624459 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0332608547452 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.0946893788 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.