Some people think that zoos are all cruel and should be closed down. Others however believe that zoos can be useful in protecting wild animals. Discuss both opinions and give your own opinion.
While several people these days believed that zoological gardens are crucial for preserving wild species, many others argued that keeping animals locked up in such place is tyranny and zoos should come to a halt. In my opinions, the cruelty of animal confinement outweighed the benefits of shielding them
On the one hand, there is a variety of explanations why wildlife parks are thought to be a good means of protecting species. First and foremost, it kept animals away from the hand of poachers or wildlife traffickers. There seem to be shreds of evidence that endangered species are safer in the national parks since there always rangers and well-trained staff looking after them. Moreover, numerous vivaria are run breeding programs to raise the number of threatened animals so that avoid them from becoming extinct. In the second place, it provided them a habitat to grow up, mate and rear offspring. It is undoubtedly true that the spread of urbanization has resulted in habitat destruction and environmental degradation. Consequently, various species hardly reproducing which led them to annihilation. Panda is a good case in point. Last but not least, zoos may raise public awareness about preserving wildlife. This is shown by dwellers can easily learn about them through a day trip or a short tour
Nevertheless, animal captivity is not a good way to protect them. The first reason is that it may degenerate the inherited survival skills of wild species. For instance, several predators such as tigers or lions lost their hunting instinct after being imprisoned for too long and no longer able to search for food on their own. Secondly, being observed by hundreds of people daily may stress wild animals. By the way of illustration, various species reportedly suffer from lacking private space and as a result, they fasted to death. Last but not least, captived animals may mistreat with insufficient food and medical care. This has so far responsible for the loss of many species due to starvation and diseases. Furthermore, captive anime may be used as a guinea pig to experience new medicine
To sum up, while zoos can bring a number of benefits such as protecting anime from poachers and environment degradations or raising awareness among population. It may also be a site for testing on animal and captive animal can be mistreated and stresses from being observed by the crowd
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-29 | amellia1607 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-25 | thuthao2000 | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-14 | stewies | 84 | view |
| 2023-01-15 | xuanmailonton | 56 | view |
| 2022-10-04 | giangngoc | 78 | view |
- What are the advantages and disadvantages of studying abroad? 78
- An increase in production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment What are the causes and possible solutions 78
- some people feel that the design of newly constructed buildings in big cities should be controlled by governments others believe those who finance the construction of a building should be free to design it as they see fit discuss both these views and give 73
- discuss both the positive and negative aspects of mobile phones 56
- Overpopulation. Problems and Solutions 11
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 306, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...utweighed the benefits of shielding them On the one hand, there is a variety of e...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, look, may, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, well, while, for instance, such as, as a result, by the way, in my opinion, to sum up, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2010.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 396.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07575757576 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80531233887 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568181818182 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 617.4 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.0695354948 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.789473684 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8421052632 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1578947368 7.06120827912 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204632883076 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0551516067345 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0607190268757 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141026831209 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.048577614815 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 306, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...utweighed the benefits of shielding them On the one hand, there is a variety of e...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, look, may, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, well, while, for instance, such as, as a result, by the way, in my opinion, to sum up, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2010.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 396.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07575757576 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80531233887 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568181818182 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 617.4 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.0695354948 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.789473684 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8421052632 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1578947368 7.06120827912 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204632883076 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0551516067345 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0607190268757 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141026831209 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.048577614815 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.