Children who grow up in families which are short of money are better prepared with the problems of adult life than children who are brought up by wealthy parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Off-springs belonging to a family with financial crisis and need to adjust are said to be more responsible and prepared for later life in comparison with the ones brought up by rich families. I complete agree with the first stated opinion and the reasons for this shall be thoroughly discussed in the subsequent paragraphs.
Firstly, the ones who are cared by below poverty line families have a sense of responsibility in them which assists them in long term and makes them capable of doing tasks efficiently and in a managed manner. For example, my maiden's child is an adolescent but is able to do jobs effectively which are indeed way more tough than a normal middle-classed teenager because the capable child knows the helplessness of his guardians due to poorness.
Secondly, individuals develop a sense of adaption and adjustment in themselves which has a great impact on their lives, either it be in the present or future life situations since adjusting in a situation and making the best out of it is counted among the best core strengths of a pupil.
Moreover, they learn how to adapt themselves in toughest and hardest fazes of life through this strategy.
Thirdly, children belonging to such families evolve a skill of decision-making, which prepares them for the hard life which is lead by adults in this rat-race world where they have to, not only make quick decisions but also recall the pros and cons of their decision. If, this skill is adapted by a youngster then it would definitely prove to be beneficial in later life.
In conclusion, I completely agree with this opinion and its readily apparent that children raised by wealthy families do not develop these essential and much-needed skills, necessary for leading a successful and jovial life in the forthcoming life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-24 | xosacob566@busantei.com | 67 | view |
| 2021-01-28 | gagandeep@13 | 89 | view |
| 2021-01-15 | Samdisha_Gandhi | 84 | view |
| 2020-08-03 | Nuttagrit Chakane | 95 | view |
| 2019-12-16 | mytruc | 84 | view |
- It is often said that governments spend too much money on projects to protect wildlife while there are other problems that are more important Do you agree or disagree 89
- Children who grow up in families which are short of money are better prepared with the problems of adult life than children who are brought up by wealthy parents To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 131, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
... great impact on their lives, either it be in the present or future life situation...
^^
Line 8, column 269, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ll the pros and cons of their decision. If, this skill is adapted by a youngster t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1501.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98671096346 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85088552226 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598006644518 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 20.2975951904 163% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.707732976 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 166.777777778 106.682146367 156% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.4444444444 20.7667163134 161% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8888888889 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223258153017 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0807366209595 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0558388087606 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0978929650142 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0551362930582 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 13.0946893788 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.44 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.1190380762 150% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.