Children who grow up in families which are short of money are better prepared with the problems of adult life than children who are brought up by wealthy parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is true that money is playing a fundamental role in society today; hence, much money will make everything become better. However, it has also been a controversial issue that whether the offspring of high-income families often lack problem-solving during adulthood compare to the children of low-income and middle-income parents or not. Personally, I believe this is generally the case in any meritocratic society.
On the one hand, wealthy parents usually provide their children with fully food and cloth even more. They have a lot of chances to send their children to a famous school or university, so children are able to approach well-educated and modern facilities. In addition, richer children will take many long trips all around the world which helps them to widen horizon knowledge and exciting experiences. As mentioned above, they have less under pressure like economic family and necessary demands.
In reality, there are, of course, children whose poorer parents might be in a better position to adapt with a wide range of harsh conditions in adult life. For the most understandable explanation, they will learn how to escape the poor circumstances by doing hard work and managing the budget, which will take shape a good foundation in their later life. Moreover, poor kids are forced to reply on basic because they know that they cannot get whatever they want as soon as they need it from their parents. By way of illustration, they may have to wait until a special occasion like a birthday to receive a schoolbag or saving their pocket-money to buy it.
In general, to finally give an actual answer that whether or not children in low-income families is tackle situations better; in this case, it still is a hot debate. I think that a good person is depending on how parents teach their children, yet.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-24 | xosacob566@busantei.com | 67 | view |
| 2021-01-28 | gagandeep@13 | 89 | view |
| 2021-01-15 | Samdisha_Gandhi | 84 | view |
| 2020-08-03 | Nuttagrit Chakane | 95 | view |
| 2019-12-16 | mytruc | 84 | view |
- Children who grow up in families which are short of money are better prepared with the problems of adult life than children who are brought up by wealthy parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Many young people today know more about international pop and movie stars than about famous people in the history in their country Why is this What can be done to increase young people s interest in famous people in the history of their country 89
- Earlier technological development brought more changes to the life of ordinary people than recent technological development does. What extent agree or disagree? 89
- The graph shows the number of births and deaths in New Zealand from 1901 to 2101 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Many people today prefer socializing online to that in the local community do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 91
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 496, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... economic family and necessary demands. In reality, there are, of course, child...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 658, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...or saving their pocket-money to buy it. In general, to finally give an actual an...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 51, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
..., to finally give an actual answer that whether or not children in low-income families is tack...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 194, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... hot debate. I think that a good person is depending on how parents teach their children, ye...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, well, i think, in addition, in general, of course, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1524.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01315789474 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82364864842 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641447368421 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7532624751 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.230769231 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3846153846 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.38461538462 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1806476767 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0612462066221 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0373281650882 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107000141725 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0160232040177 0.056905535591 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.