Citizens have major impacts on preserving the environmental surroundings along with the authorities and prestigious enterprises. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is arguable whether citizens have major impacts on preserving the environmental surroundings along with the authorities and prestigious enterprises. Many argue that it is the high-ranking officials and big organizations which are the only group significantly solving the problem, but I believe that both groups bear responsibilities to tackle environmental-related issues.
The national governments and big companies play a crucial role in addressing burning problems of the environment, along with their residents. Individuals who are in charge of these jobs have to meet the minimum requirements like finishing university, and are even more competent than average people to get into. Undoubtedly, these people are highly academic, and gain profound understandings of various fields such as politics, health and environment, so that they could come up with comprehensive resolutions to the issues. Since the environment is one the most burning issues occurring in recent years, there must be specific and long-term policies and plans made by the authorities and enterprises. And many prestigious companies have such a decent team with many talented persons that could conduct enormous research and reach practical solutions such as switching to renewable energy to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
On the other hand, the public is still off paramount importance to alleviate the problems. With the advent of the Internet and technological advancements, any citizen could acquire essential knowledge of the environmental nature and companies’ policies at the moment. Ones could build greater awareness and action by ensuring their products come from a company which is environmentally friendly. If they realize the enterprise is detrimental to nature, they could provoke massive campaigns on platforms like social media to affect the brand and make them change their products, which has happened in the past.
In conclusion, it is crucial for all residents and organizations to contribute to the improvements of nature and protecting our planet.
- Citizens have major impacts on preserving the environmental surroundings along with the authorities and prestigious enterprises Do you agree 89
- Citizens have major impacts on preserving the environmental surroundings along with the authorities and prestigious enterprises To what extent do you agree or disagree 11
- With the advent of technology that makes space communication easier sending tourists into space is within our grasp and many believe that a new tourism industry could be considerably enhanced in the years to come Some related issues will be significantly 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, still, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1755.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69805194805 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33800815582 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626623376623 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.7249411704 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.25 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6666666667 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.08333333333 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0600925886265 0.244688304435 25% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.021261882316 0.084324248473 25% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0154894844192 0.0667982634062 23% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0334611099029 0.151304729494 22% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0114331660186 0.056905535591 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.0946893788 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.08 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.52 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.