Classmates are a more important influence than parents on a child's success at school. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
In today's modern society, there needs numerous factors for children's success in academic settings. There is a huge statement that acquaintances influence more than parents a child to be successful at school. From my point of view, I partly agree with this statement.
On the one hand, there are two major reasons that show that parents have an impact on their adolescents. First, parents are the first educators in a child's life. Parents provide guidance, support and create a learning environment at home, which comfort teenagers comfortable enough to learn. Besides, they also have abilities to satisfy their children's needs. They can sacrifice everything to give juveniles the best education that hand they have more chances to be successful in the future. Second, parents are the source of encouragement and motivation. They are the ones who know the importance of education and set expectations for their children's academic performance. Parents frequently create a conducive environment at home. They assist their youth with their homework and engage in discussions about school topics, which support infants to be more interested in studying and want to widen their knowledge about various topics. In short, parents can boost a child's motivation significantly and drive them to succeed.
On the other hand, acquaintances are as essential as parents for two rationales. To begin with, companions are understandable people. They and the toddler are the same age, consequently, they are likely to understand each other thoroughly. Besides, they assist each other to solve their problems easily. At their age, they have various sensitive secrets, which can not talk about with their parents; however, they can share them with their acquaintances without worrying so that they can work out suitable solutions. For this reason, they can teach each other soft skills which comfort them deal with certain situations, that parents do not educate them about it at home. In addition, comrades create a competitive studying environment. When receiving the results of exams, adolescents see their roommate ought to have better results than them, and they will be motivated to study harder. That support builds up a beneficial academic setting.
In conclusion, I party agree with the statement that companions are a more vital influence than parents on a child's success at school.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-02 | XunHai | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-02 | minhtrang2k9 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-02 | ngocnhi31 | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-02 | mchau | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-02 | maomatmeo23 | 78 | view |
- Children today are too dependent on computers and electronic entertainment It would be better for them to be outside playing sports and taking part in more traditional pastimes than spending all day indoors Do you agree or disagree with this statement Wri 89
- Classmates are a more important influence than parents on a child s success at school Do you agree or disagree with this statement 67
- Children today are too dependent on computers and electronic entertainment It would be better for them to be outside playing sports and taking part in more traditional pastimes than spending all day indoors Do you agree or disagree with this statement Wri 78
- Children today are too dependent on computers and electronic entertainment It would be better for them to be outside playing sports and taking part in more traditional pastimes than spending all day indoors Do you agree or disagree with this statement Wri 84
- Computers are being used more and more in education Some people say that this is a positive trend while others argue that it is leading to negative consequences Discuss both views and give your opinion 95
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, consequently, first, however, if, second, so, in addition, in conclusion, in short, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 24.0651302605 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2007.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 375.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.352 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81973994073 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 605.7 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 5.43587174349 258% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.3819330656 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.2608695652 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3043478261 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.69565217391 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 8.67935871743 230% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280728836099 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0936830932635 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133485613176 0.0667982634062 200% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.295310094167 0.151304729494 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.180149607645 0.056905535591 317% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.