Recently, a debate has been going on about the role of university degree in finding a job. Some people argue academic qualification is an excellent way to secure work, whereas others think personal attributes and experience help in this regard. Both these factors have their own importance but without soft skills and work experience, it is impossible to get an appropriate job nowadays.
The academic qualification helps a professional in learning basic idea of any field. It means that the subjects taught by expert teachers equip them with necessary information required to perform a task. Without these core concepts, professionals cannot grasp the ambiguities of job so, those who have university degrees produce better results and follow modern standards. Moreover, companies prefer the employees who have basic knowledge and know modern researches. For instance, companies like Apple only recruit employees who have Ivy league qualifications because they have excellent grip over their respective fields and are most connected to the new developments in technology. Hence, owing to the better understanding of the subject, those individuals who have university degrees have better chances to secure a position.
On the other hand, individuals who have worked in a particular field for years have in-depth knowledge about how the system works. They know the complexities of the field better than a fresh graduate coming out of university with no practical experience. Also, the world is going through a shift in definition of professionalism and soft skills like professional interactions and communication skills are now valued more than university qualifications. Furthermore, often the information taught in universities is outdated because the curriculum is seldom updated regularly. In countries like Pakistan, academic standards are not revised in decades so, professionals often possess university degrees but do not know necessary skills. Therefore, those who have work experience and professional attributes are considered better candidates for a job.
To conclude, university qualification teaches individuals conceptual and bookish knowledge but it is not always effective due to poor education standards in many universities. Also, due to a shift in professional definitions, soft skills and and work experience are valued more than mere pieces of paper in job market. Considering these it can be stated without doubt that having previous work experience and excellent interpersonal skills is the best way to secure a job.
- technology is becoming increasingly prevalent in the world today. In the not too distant future, technology will completely replace the teacher in the classroom. Do you agree or disagree with this statement ? 56
- As people live longer and longer, the idea of cloning human beings in order to provide spare parts is becoming a reality. The idea horrifies most people, yet it is no longer mere science fiction. 73
- Today much of the food people eat gets transported from farms that are thousands of miles away. Some people believe it would be better for the environment and the economy if people only consumed food produced by the local farmers. Would the advantages of 67
- The continued rise in the world’s population is the greatest problem faced by humanity at the present time.What are the causes of this continued rise?Do you agree that it is the greatest problem faced by humanity? 84
- The average standard of people's health is likely to be lower in the future than it is now.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 238, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: and
...n professional definitions, soft skills and and work experience are valued more than me...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, whereas, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2159.0 1615.20841683 134% => OK
No of words: 385.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60779220779 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18314417109 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535064935065 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 687.6 506.74238477 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.5832329316 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.944444444 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3888888889 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55555555556 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183961745657 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0579684676572 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0521228312351 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134991234845 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0747063956531 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.