The diagram illustrates the formation of different types of tea by processing tea leaves.
The process mainly comprises of four steps but each tea goes through some specific technique to achieve its unique type.
To begin, the first three steps are same and include growing leaves, plucking and then withering them. Similarly, all the tea types are oven dried as part of their final manufacturing process. While white tea is produced without any additional step, other teas need some more technical processing.
It can be seen that steaming and then rolling is done in case of green tea, however, Oolong and large leaf black tea are produced without steaming. Furthermore, Oolong tea is slightly fermented before oven drying whilst large and small leaf black tea are fully fermented. However, unlike all others, for small leaf black tea, leaves goes through crushing process before they can be fermented and oven dried.
- The diagram below shows how the water cycle works. 56
- The pie chart shows the percentage of women in poverty and the bar chart shows poverty rates by sex and age. They are from the United States in 2008. 78
- With the increased global demand in oil and gas, undiscovered areas of the world should be opened up to access more resources.To what extent do you agree? 89
- The diagram shows how tea leaves are processed into five tea types. 61
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life Others think that it is better to work for different organisations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 72
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 20, Rule ID: COMPRISES_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprises' or 'consists of'?
Suggestion: comprises; consists of
...essing tea leaves. The process mainly comprises of four steps but each tea goes through so...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, similarly, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 15.0 33.7804878049 44% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 773.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 150.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15333333333 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49963551158 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42084466435 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.66 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 229.5 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 19.8112184128 43.030603864 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.625 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315428145243 0.215688989381 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15783434963 0.103423049105 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0904882224921 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218100571054 0.15604864568 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.085170933085 0.0819641961636 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.