History has always been an important part of school education, but different pupils show different levels of interest in studying it. It is argued that a lot of students find this subject mundane, which puts a major dent on their academic growth. However, visiting historical sites and using online resources can effectively make studying history enjoyable.
One way to deal with this problem is arranging group trips to various historical places in the country. This experiance brings theoratical facts about distant past to life for young minds, and makes it more real for them. As a result, they become curious about knowing more stories behind those historical structures. For example, taking school children to Auschwitz on a one day tour is a good way to inform them about Holocaust and its effect on jews. Moreover, these tours can work as important tool to engage in group discussions and help them in making better social ties with other children who are interested in history. All in all, this whole experiance can make studying history just more than a forced exercise required to pass exams.
Another method to counter boredom associated with historical study is to encourage use of computers to gain information about historical figures. Since, internet is quite famous among school students these days, reading about historical personalities by using online resources will not feel like a burden and instead become leaisure activity. Moreover, historical information is regularly updated on internet and new interesting information is added to create variety. There are plethora of blogs about Nelson Mandela, for instance, bringing new facts from his life everyday, that can inspire school students to read history of black people. This method also has an added benefit that computer skills learned by students while researching can be used to know about other subjects and motivate youngsters to indulge in research and critical thinking.
To conclude, many school students are not keen about studying history and find it monotonous but combining academic exercise with outdoor tours and online tools can prove significantly effective. However, using internet for getting historical information is undoubtedly the best method to make studying history fun because of its popularity among youngsters and effect on research skills of students.
- Many children are encouraged by their parents to get a part time job in their free time. What are the advantages and disadvantages to children of doing so. 73
- The diagram below give information about two road tunnels in one Australian city 79
- Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Governments must invest this money in public services instead.To what extent do yo u agree with this statement? 67
- Nowadays a lot of offices are being built an open plan design. Why is that? Do you see this as a positive or negative development?. Discuss your opinion and support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience or observations. 84
- The bar chart shows the number of times per week (in 1000s), over five weeks, that three computer packages were downloaded from the internet.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 566, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...tance, bringing new facts from his life everyday, that can inspire school students to re...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, while, for example, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1990.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 370.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37837837838 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67595412147 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572972972973 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 626.4 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7208082496 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.375 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.125 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1875 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205039189841 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0687493960394 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.051093371616 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132167605532 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0244714736219 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.