Computers are being used more and more in education and so there will soon be no role for the teacher in education. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, we're living in the world of modern technology existing everywhere in daily life. All of tedious tasks are handled by computer day by day, however there'd still some jobs need human being to involve in, especially in education. It's disagreed that computer and technology will one day replace educators. This essay will discuss, firstly the limitation of computer and technology in teaching knowledge for students, secondly the essential role of teachers in the path of guideline their students.
We can easily catch up the technology emerging in supporting for teaching students in recent years, for instance the project manager machine, computer and many educational softwares. However, it still has some barriers in transmitting the knowledge to students. For example, when we learn something about mathematics, the technology which just help in displaying the content and complicated formula or notation, is so tedious and limited. Therefor, teacher come up and explain meaning by natural speech to help their students easily imagine what it is. The computer still can not resolve the problem of explaining the complicated notation meaningfully.
Secondly, with teacher supporting, students would approach and solving the issues rapidly and conveniently. On the other side, people tend to feel comfortable and emotional when speaking with human beings than a humanoid or a robot. Moreover, many unexpected cases that computer can not resolve by using its algorithm such as resolving the conflict and violent etc. However, with teacher who can approach and handle the issues more flexible way.
To summing up, computer and technology are the great invention of human kind of all time, however it should not replaced the role of human in teaching students. We should consider it to be a tool for supporting the teachers in classroom. It will make the course be more fantastic and comprehensive.
- The charts summarise the weight measurements of people living in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 67
- Marriages and divorces 67
- The charts summarise the weight measurements of people living in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The graph and table below give informatio about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 157, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: there'd
...handled by computer day by day, however thered still some jobs need human being to inv...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 318, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r can not resolve by using its algorithm such as resolving the conflict and viole...
^^
Line 6, column 113, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'should' requires the base form of the verb: 'replace'
Suggestion: replace
...kind of all time, however it should not replaced the role of human in teaching students....
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, for example, for instance, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1611.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83607514397 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0531286871 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.6875 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9375 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254336852757 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.07778376831 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589973572831 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150004808526 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0473116602159 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.