consumer durables owned in britain from 1972 to 1983
The table compares the loyalty customers of six separate commodities, namely central heating, television video, vacuum cleaner, refrigerator, washing machine and telephone from 1972 to 1983.
Overall, as can be inferred from the data, there was an upward progression in all items between the year 1972 and 1983 whilst television registered the highest figures out of all 6 groups examined throughout the process.
Looking at the table, television witnessed a noticeable opening number from 93 to 98 in 1972 and 1983 respectively, while vacuum cleaner was the second highest group in this period with a sole exception in the year 1983. In addition, there was a similar pattern in the proportion of refrigerators by 21 in these 8 years. Meanwhile, the figure for central heating increased exponentially from 39 in 1972 to 64 in 1983 and washing machine mirrored the trend above.
In details, the amount of consumer durables in video group jumped from zero in the first seven years to 18 in 1983. A similar vigorous growth was observed in the proportion of dishwasher in the last five years from 3 to 5.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-04 | RAJNICWV | 73 | view |
| 2021-11-07 | EELLeeee | 92 | view |
| 2021-10-27 | vdung120894 | 61 | view |
| 2021-10-11 | Rifa | 87 | view |
| 2019-10-02 | daniel.funkiee | 70 | view |
- consumer durables owned in britain from 1972 to 1983 56
- The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel's customer service. The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010.Summarise the information by selectin 56
- Nowadays many people choose to be self employed rather than to work for a company or organization Why might this be the case What could be the disadvantages of being self employed 67
- Government should ban abortion. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 11
- Competitiveness is a positive quality for people in most societies. How does competitiveness affect individuals? Is it a positive or negative trend? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, look, second, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 7.30460921844 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 2.0 24.0651302605 8% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 922.0 1615.20841683 57% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 184.0 315.596192385 58% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01086956522 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 4.20363070211 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8435705011 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 176.041082164 64% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.608695652174 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 506.74238477 53% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 16.0721442886 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.2846790782 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.714285714 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2857142857 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2936175639 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131597992714 0.084324248473 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0769022486258 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172934355385 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0399766028826 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 78.4519038076 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 9.78957915832 204% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.