The consumption of the world’s resources is increasing at a dangerous rate. What are the causes and solutions?
Natural resources have been playing a crucial role in most aspects of people’s lives; unfortunately, they are now being consumed to such an alarming rate that sparks insurmountable concerns in today's world. The following essay will examine the culprits behind as well as suggest some ways to handle this impulsive consumption.
The excessive usage of the world's resources can stem from a number of reasons. It can be first put down to the fact that people’s demands are constantly rising these days as the globe is now undergoing an ever-evolving shift in every aspect. This thus leads to people, especially in developing countries, aspiring for higher needs such as renovated infrastructure or more electricity use in home, which might gobble up large amounts of natural resources. Furthermore, it is also because of the convenience these kinds of energy can bring that results in their being over-extracted. Compared to renewable ones, natural resources are far easier to use and also cheaper than converting sustainable alternatives like solar or wind energy. That explains why the world's sources are being consumed immoderately.
For this concern to be addressed, some measures should be taken immediately. To begin with, scientists should be encouraged to develop renewable sources of energy so that we can save up more natural ones and also mitigate their effects on contaminating the environment. Besides, governments should consider imposing higher taxes to reduce rising demand for non renewable energies. By doing that, people will have to think more carefully whenever it comes to consuming these kinds of sources. Last but not least, more stringent regulations, together with thorough inspection, should be carried out in order to avoid illegal exploitations of energy.
In recapitulation, the consumption of natural resources are remaining at such a high level, which makes these sources face the risk of running out soon. Therefore, steps must be taken to help reverse this urgent problem; otherwise, it will continue turning for worse.
- Some believe that it is good for a country s culture to import films and TV programmes while others think it is better for a country to have their own films and TV programmes Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
- The gap between the rich and the poor is wider as rich people become richer and poor people grow poorer What problems could this situation cause and what measures can be done to address those problems 89
- Some believe that it is good for a country s culture to import films and TV programmes while others think it is better for a country to have their own films and TV programmes Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
- Some people believe that crime is a result of social problems and poverty others think that crime is a result of a bad person s nature Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Many employers find that their new employees lack sufficient interpersonal skills such as lack of ability to work with colleagues as a team What are the causes Can you suggest some possible solutions 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, furthermore, if, so, therefore, thus, well, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1744.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41614906832 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99548288453 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630434782609 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2947701954 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.266666667 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4666666667 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0825659268823 0.244688304435 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0305390510766 0.084324248473 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474650441702 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0597714969664 0.151304729494 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0360803497831 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, furthermore, if, so, therefore, thus, well, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1744.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41614906832 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99548288453 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630434782609 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2947701954 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.266666667 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4666666667 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0825659268823 0.244688304435 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0305390510766 0.084324248473 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474650441702 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0597714969664 0.151304729494 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0360803497831 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.