I think it is beneficial that goods like food, cars, furniture and clothes that are produced
in a certain part of the world are now available almost everywhere, which means the
similarities between various countries are growing.
People in different regions now have access to products they could not use before. There are numerous goods that are produced only in certain parts of the world, which means that people living in other places could not normally take advantage of them in the past. For example, bananas and pineapples are grown in tropical countries and so, did not use to be available to consumers in colder countries like Russia and Canada. Nevertheless, most people in such countries are now able to buy and eat these beneficial fruits. Furthermore, people can now migrate to different countries with less fear of becoming homesick since the products they are used to are now available in shops wherever they go. For instance, Iranian immigrants could not cook their national dish, Ghormesabzi, in other parts of the globe because the specific vegetables required were not grown there.
However, as they can access all these ingredients in shops and supermarkets around the world today, they do not miss a significant part of their cultural heritage anymore, allowing them to work and live more productively.
Some may argue that the global spread of similar goods and the growing similarity between countries can reduce people’s motivation to travel to other parts of the world, decreasing tourism and the revenue it brings to countries. But I think people will still travel to see and experience the natural features of other countries like forests, mountains and wildlife.
In conclusion, I believe the growing similarity between countries around the world is a desirable development. People can now take advantage of beneficial goods from other countries, and immigrants can be less stressed and more productive.
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems 73
- The graph below shows the number of visitors to three museums between 2000 and 2005.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 89
- the bar chart below shows the types of music bought in USA in 2010 by age group 64
- The bar chart below shows the number of students who chose certain university subjects in 2005. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and makes comparisons where relevant. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 93, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... furniture and clothes that are produced in a certain part of the world are now a...
^^^
Line 2, column 84, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lable almost everywhere, which means the similarities between various countries a...
^^^
Line 4, column 348, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...n in tropical countries and so, did not use to be available to consumers in colder ...
^^^
Line 6, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...k and live more productively. Some may argue that the global spread of similar goods...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, still, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1633.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23397435897 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7637034552 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512820512821 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 502.2 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.3971293588 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.083333333 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.16666666667 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.38176352705 160% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232059334289 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0875717983533 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0356148403104 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0991154992331 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0578308887943 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.