Crime rate, in most countries, is often higher in urban areas than in rural areas.
Why do you think that is?
What can be done to reduce the crime rate?
In recent years, the fact that the crime rate in metropolitan areas is higher than that of the rural ones has been receiving a lot of public attention. Although this issue can be attributed to a whole host of reasons, some feasible solutions can be utilized to tackle this problem.
There are a variety of factors contributing to the increased crime rate in cities. First, since these areas are always more ethnic diverse compared to the countryside, the likelihood of conflicts leading to crimes is significantly higher. For example, racism against people of color still exists, which leads to crimes, from small fights to bloody conflicts. Second, since urban areas are densely populated, citizens have to compete for limited opportunities and scarce resources. This means that people of disadvantageous positions in society have a higher tendency to commit even the pettiest of crimes, just to make a living.
Nevertheless, there are still workable solutions to address this conundrum. First, by extinguishing racism with heavy fines and stricter punishments, the government can keep interracial conflicts in check. In fact, many countries around the globe have already treated racism with an iron grip, imposing laws against racial discrimination which positively effect public order as a whole. Second, the government should enact policies which divert the population flow away from the cities. This means that if the authority invests more in the suburb or the countryside, more people with flock into these areas to make a living in lieu of the urban ones, which relieve the population burden upon the metropolises.
In conclusion, notwithstanding the ever-increasing crime rate in urban areas due to their overpopulation, feasible solutions are in order. The government holds the key to alleviate the population burdens, which in turn will lower crime rate to a manageable level.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-08-02 | Anastasia Chinemerem Izundu | 56 | view |
- The technology development has affected social relationships from person to person Do the positive aspects of this trend outweigh the negative aspects 89
- The technology development has affected social relationships from person to person Do the positive aspects of this trend outweigh the negative aspects 89
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change we need to find a way to live with it To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment such as the South Pole Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Nowadays many people buy things excessively Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 46
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, nevertheless, second, so, still, as to, for example, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1601.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37248322148 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97722122509 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573825503356 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5740093955 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.357142857 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2857142857 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256999966697 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0869806476739 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0843704217073 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174885694318 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0801968364093 0.056905535591 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.