Culture is turning similar around the world. What are the reasons ? What are the negative and positive aspects?
Culture is turning similar around the world. What are the reasons ? What are the negative and positive aspects?
The modern era is characterized by an interconnected world. Since the end of the World Word II, markets became more interdependent, moreover, the development of the Internet boosted up the circulation of the information and the culture which nowadays is becoming more similar everywhere on the planet. Many people believe that this process, called globalization, is positive because ideas such as the freedom of speech can spread around the world; others believe that we are experiencing a serious homologation.
In the second half of the 20th century, the concept of global market arose, with the multinational, especially from the United States that opened branches all over the world, spreading standardized habits, culture and status symbols. This process was empathized with the advent of the coming of the Internet, that undoubtedly helped a lot in shaping a "global culture". With the World Wide Web, in almost every corner of the world, people watch the same movies, read the same books and buy the same products.
This global homologation poses a serious problem: all different cultures around the globe may risk disappearing forever under the advance of the new global culture. If one day the new global civilization will replace the countless manifestations of the human's creativity the world surely will become more boring and less worth to travel around.
On the other hand, an advantage of this process of cultural unification is the more easy diffusion of liberal ideas such as the freedom of speech, the freedom of movement and, more generally, the spreading of a culture more respectful of the individual. If the new global culture will be able to embrace this values, then it will become more difficult for any kind of authoritarian regime to suppress these human rights, due to the decentralized nature of the internet.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-16 | Mario Nese | 84 | view |
- Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present.To what extent do you agree or disagree?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 67
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change, we need to find a way to live with it. To what extent do you agree or disagree?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 84
- Plan A below shows a health centre in 2005. Plan B shows the same place in the present day.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and making comparisons where relevant. 11
- The diagram below shows some design principles for an energy efficient house and how they work in different climates Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 93
- More children in developed countries are becoming overweight. This is a serious problem for wealthy countries.Discuss some causes and effects of this problem. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experi 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 351, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...hat undoubtedly helped a lot in shaping a 'global culture'. With the Wo...
^
Line 13, column 254, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...ace the countless manifestations of the humans creativity the world surely will become...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, moreover, second, so, then, kind of, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1665.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26898734177 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94433490989 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575949367089 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.4399032279 49.4020404114 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.076923077 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3076923077 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53846153846 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30311948318 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.163763221221 0.084324248473 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.191987294375 0.0667982634062 287% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.272900587457 0.151304729494 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.364831214608 0.056905535591 641% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.