Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport. Why is it not popular in many places? How can we increase its popularity?

Essay topics:

Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport. Why is it not popular in many places? How can we increase its popularity?

It is true that cycling is ecologically friendly means of transportation system by providing no pollution while majority of people tend to use other vehicles. Therefore, this essay will look into reasons and possible solution in this phenomenon.

To start with, riding a bicycle needs peoples' effort and time rather than other transport. This means that people spend much time on travelling to destination and they should fit well for cycling that requires strong physical condition as well. Another reason is that there are not adequate cycling paths in many roads unlike car lanes regarding this people who commute work by bicycle face dangerous road condition frequently because of lack of bicycle paths. For example, commuting by bicycle leads people to ride car lane since some bicycle path suddenly emerge to car lane, which might take place accidents.

There are several possible solutions to increase using bicycle. One is that we could construct facilities for cycling such as cycling path and shower room, which brings more convenient and comfortable for people who enjoy cycling and safe trips. For instance, some people who enjoy cycling avoid to commute to work by bicycle that need to take a shower after cycling. What is more, the government should provide suitable education programs and rental services as free of charge. As a result , by offering education of cycling which prevent possible accident in busy road people are more likely to use bicycle to travel.

In conclusion, lack of bicycle paths or weakness physical condition would cause minor people enjoy cycling. It, however, could encourage more and more people to ride bicycle by building many cycling paths and teaching how to ride bicycle in traffic.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-07-05 Do Thi Quynh Hoa 11 view
2017-03-10 mussobat 73 view
2017-03-10 mussobat 11 view
2017-03-10 mussobat 73 view
2017-03-10 mussobat 11 view
Essays by user mussobat :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 347, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...n many roads unlike car lanes regarding this people who commute work by bicycle face...
^^^^
Line 5, column 291, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'avoid commuting'.
Suggestion: avoid commuting
...instance, some people who enjoy cycling avoid to commute to work by bicycle that need to take a ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 491, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... services as free of charge. As a result , by offering education of cycling which ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, look, regarding, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, it is true, to start with, what is more

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1459.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21071428571 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48248126643 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9489318977 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.230769231 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5384615385 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0769230769 7.06120827912 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150213275747 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0592266392634 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0492983817615 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0974586744857 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0170581336018 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.