Demand for oil and gas is increasing and so finding new sources in remote and untouched areas is a necessity. Do the advantages of this overweigh its disadvantages.
Nowdays, the usage of oil and gas is rising in the world due to massive exploitation of population in the world. So, it is advocated by some individuals that new sources should be find in outskirts and coutryside areas. Nevertheless, I firmly agree this said notion and I think the benefits of this can overweigh its drawbacks.
The cities are become more polluted in these days due the immense use of oil and gas vehicals. So, if goverment would find new resouces in the remotes areas, then it will reduce the pollution in the urban areas. Futhermore, new sources cal also overcome the usage of oil and gas. To elucidate it, findings of new alternatives would help to attract people towards use of these instead of gas and oil. Thus, in these ways new findings can assist to individuals usage of alternatives.
Moreover, new subsitutes not only reduce the chance of scaricty of gas and oil, but also increase the economy of the country. To explain it, the introduction of new alternatives industries can use these to produce more and more goods as well as reduce the pollution in the environment. Hence, it can aslo help to raise economic growtn of the nation.
Paradoxically, despite of its merits, it also has some demerits such as remote area can lost their biodeversity because these areas are mostly known for rich in greenery. So, these places can lost thier thia ability due to findings of new resources. In addtion to this, residents of outskirts can also face innumerable issue such as health problems cause of to find new resouces.
In conclution, although these subsitutes are beneficial, it can also leads to number of problems for remote areas population.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-30 | arsh wahid | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-30 | arsh wahid | 73 | view |
- Many companies sponsor sports as a way of advertising themselves Some people think that it is good thing while others think that it has disadvantages Discuss both views and give your own opinion 56
- Some people argue that technological innovations such as mobile phone are making people socially less interactive Do you agree or disagree 67
- It has become more easier and more affordable for people to travel to other countries Is this a positive or negative development 76
- Some people argue that technological innovations such as mobile phone are making people socially less interactive Do you agree or disagree 67
- Some believe that people today have no interest in maintaining the traditional culture of their country or region other believe that it is still important to people that we preserve a traditional way of life Discuss both these views and give your own opin 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 70, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'lead'
Suggestion: lead
... subsitutes are beneficial, it can also leads to number of problems for remote areas ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 109, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'areas'' or 'area's'?
Suggestion: areas'; area's
... leads to number of problems for remote areas population.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, then, thus, well, i think, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1398.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88811188811 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78184595682 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520979020979 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.5938432035 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.2 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0666666667 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316597825189 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110381884588 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0481265010985 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174351527406 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0571915430924 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.