Developments of technology are causing environmental problems. Some people think the solution is that everyone except a simpler life, while others believe that technology can solve these problems.it
Discuss both views and make your opinion.
While the development of technology improved a better life for a human, there are certain environmental issues following by. In order to solve this situation, some people expect to have a simpler life than before, and others considered that technology can have a resolution on this issue. In my opinion, the simple lifestyle is the most efficient methods to remit the serious environmental problems.
Human activities are the main devastation of the environment. As a result, human should implement the restructure of living form as simple as possible. For instance, individuals should reduce their waste as the limit, in order to decline the air pollution which is produced by the emissions and fumes from the product factories. But also the soil pollution comes from the numerous of un-recycled wastes abandoned on the landfill. In order to decline the waste, one of the examples is that people can replace the plastic bag to reusable cloth bags when purchasing. Moreover, citizens should prefer commuted by public transportations rather than by private cars. Since the main elements lead to air pollution is carbon emissions own by the vehicle, it’s responsible for all individuals to decrease the worst of the air quality.
There is no doubt about the contributions of environmental solutions by technology. Such as the innovations of bio-degrade materials, and the design of sustainable energy resources methods. Unfortunately, there are still many waste and pollutions being generated during the processes. One clear example is the structure of the solar panel to produce sustainable energy, which is based on non-biodegrade materials.
In conclusion, no matter how technology introduces efficient methods to solve environmental issues, the most significant solutions are reform simply human activities.
(280words)
- Surveys show that people are living longer in many countries But increased life expectancy has many implications for ageing individuals and for society as a whole What are the possible effects of longer living for individuals and society 71
- The international community must act immediately to ensure that all countries reduce their consumption of fossil fuels, such as gas and oil. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Every year several languages die out. Some people think that this is not important because it will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?Give reasons for your answer and include any 67
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 61
- Developments of technology are causing environmental problems. Some people think the solution is that everyone except a simpler life, while others believe that technology can solve these problems.itDiscuss both views and make your opinion. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
While the development of technology impr...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the serious environmental problems. Human activities are the main devastatio...
^^^^
Line 4, column 103, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nt. As a result, human should implement the restructure of living form as simple as possible. F...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rease the worst of the air quality. There is no doubt about the contribution...
^^^^
Line 6, column 226, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun waste seems to be countable; consider using: 'many wastes'.
Suggestion: many wastes
...methods. Unfortunately, there are still many waste and pollutions being generated during t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... based on non-biodegrade materials. In conclusion, no matter how technology ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, still, while, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1558.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54448398577 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14882475323 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583629893238 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.193956581 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.866666667 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7333333333 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186963968134 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.052691060633 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0686995163304 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1221460657 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117751193969 0.056905535591 207% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.