Developments in technology have brought various environmental problems. Some believe that people need to live simpler lives to solve environmental problems. Others, however, believe technology is the way to solve these problems. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is true that developing technology is a factor affect to the environment in today's world. While many believe that living such a simple life could lessen environmental issues, I would argue that using technology to tackle these problems is a better choice.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that living simply without using technology may have fewer impacts on the environment. From the agriculture perspective, farmers should use manual methods for planting instead of relying on the chemical technology. For example, in Vietnam, farmers usually use chemical fertilisers and weedkillers supporting the growth of crops. It may inflict damage on ecosystems such as wild plants or animals grow among crop. From the transportation perspective, emissions from vehicles on roads are one of the reasons cause air and noise pollutions. Therefore, people should commute using simple vehicles like the bicycle or public transport to reduce that pollutions.
On the other hand, I firmly agree with the argument that technology plays a pivotal role in environmental protection. Firstly, the cleaner technology which uses renewable energy sources is applied to replace devices relying on fossil fuels such as cars buses and lorries. This not only utilises radically natural power but also reduce emissions fuels affect to the environment. Secondly, waste treatment systems, nowadays, are being integrated with many factories and other systems are built using technology to handle garbage from residential areas.
In conclusion, although living simpler lives can certainly help in tackling the environmental problems due to its benefits, it seems to me that advances in technology provide many solutions and this trend will gather pace in future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-12-20 | trish | 73 | view |
| 2018-03-12 | kimloan268 | 89 | view |
- The take below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities. 61
- The graph below shows the changes in food consumption by Chinese people between 1985 and 2010. 84
- Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to a successful career, while others believe that it is better to get a job straight after school.Discuss both views 67
- The graph below shows the pollution levels in London between 1600 and 2000 81
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 223, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...lutions and this trend will gather pace in future.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1478.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51492537313 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87342506767 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623134328358 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.102167234 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.692307692 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6153846154 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9230769231 7.06120827912 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184240158564 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0629844664846 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.064019926997 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12502119092 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.05255010376 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.